2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A shock tube study of the rate constants of HO2 and CH3 reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
17
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are in very good agreement with the most recent experimental observations of Hong et al. . In a recent publication on CH 4 /C 2 H 6 ignition delay times , we discussed this choice and have illustrated comparisons of the Jasper et al.…”
Section: Mechanism Developmentsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These are in very good agreement with the most recent experimental observations of Hong et al. . In a recent publication on CH 4 /C 2 H 6 ignition delay times , we discussed this choice and have illustrated comparisons of the Jasper et al.…”
Section: Mechanism Developmentsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These are in very good agreement with the most recent experimental observations of Hong et al [110]. In a recent publication on CH 4 /C 2 H 6 ignition delay times [47], we discussed this choice and have illustrated comparisons of the Jasper et al [109] calculations and the Hong et al [110] measurements together with those of Zhu and Lin [111], Scire et al [112], and Srinivasan et al [113]. Products (R147-R149).…”
Section: Figure 12supporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, OM II yields an optimized k 99 to be 0.7 × 1.34×10 13 = 9.4×10 12 cm 3 /mol-s, which is in better agreement with the more recent measurement of Hong et al [66], 6.8×10 12 cm 3 /mol-s with an uncertainty factor of 1.4. Additionally, OM II also gives a more reasonable R108 than OM I.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Particularly, only upper limit rate constant is determined indirectly at one temperature point of 830 K in the low-pressure range of 0.15-0.56 bar in the O 2 bath gas [6]. More recently, Rxn.1 has received two experimental investigations and that was by Srinivasan et al [4] for the forward reaction in 1,655-1,822 K and by Hong et al [7] for reverse reaction in 1,054-1,249 K. The results of such measurements have some uncertainty due to the above difficulties, especially for the reverse reaction because of the difficulty in measuring the concentrations of both radicals accurately for rate constant determinations. In addition, for kinetic modeling purposes, we are interested in reliable kinetic data in a much larger range of temperature (e.g., 300-2,500 K).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%