2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sensitive and specific real-time PCR targeting DNA from wheat, barley and rye to track gluten contamination in marketed foods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is the most commonly used method for gluten analysis not only for its selectivity and sensitivity but also for the lack of other reference methods (García-García et al, 2020;Lacorn et al, 2019;Morón et al, 2008;Sajic et al, 2020;Sherf, 2017;Skerrit and Hill, 1990;Valdés et al, 2003;Zhanga et al, 2019). Besides ELISA, other analytical methodologies are currently being developed like mass spectrometry combined with proteomic technologies (Colgrave et al, 2015;Fiedler et al, 2018), methods based on DNA amplification (García-García et al, 2019;Garrido-Maestu et al, 2018;Martín-Fernández et al, 2015 and electrochemical sensors using as recognition elements molecular imprinted polymers (Iskierko et al, 2019) and aptamers (López-López et al, 2017;Malbano et al, 2017;White et al, 2018). Among electrochemical sensors, aptasensors are emerging as alternatives to reference methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is the most commonly used method for gluten analysis not only for its selectivity and sensitivity but also for the lack of other reference methods (García-García et al, 2020;Lacorn et al, 2019;Morón et al, 2008;Sajic et al, 2020;Sherf, 2017;Skerrit and Hill, 1990;Valdés et al, 2003;Zhanga et al, 2019). Besides ELISA, other analytical methodologies are currently being developed like mass spectrometry combined with proteomic technologies (Colgrave et al, 2015;Fiedler et al, 2018), methods based on DNA amplification (García-García et al, 2019;Garrido-Maestu et al, 2018;Martín-Fernández et al, 2015 and electrochemical sensors using as recognition elements molecular imprinted polymers (Iskierko et al, 2019) and aptamers (López-López et al, 2017;Malbano et al, 2017;White et al, 2018). Among electrochemical sensors, aptasensors are emerging as alternatives to reference methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Spanish National Center for Plant Genetic Resources (CRF-INIA, Madrid, Spain) kindly supplied different kernels of common, spelt, rivet and durum wheats, barley and rye (10 cultivars each). More information about these reference samples can be obtained from García-García et al 2019 [ 27 ]. Non-target plant species included in the specificity assays and 30 commercially available foodstuffs from several brands were acquired from local retailers and food stores in Madrid (Spain) including products with different declarations with regard to the gluten-containing cereals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real time PCR methods can be also used for the quantitative detection of gluten when using model mixtures [ 46 , 47 ]. Moreover, PCR methods perform indirect detection (not pathogenic compounds of gluten—rather the DNA that codifies for it) [ 48 ].…”
Section: Methods For Gluten Detection In Food Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%