2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-67202013000400014
View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: The MELD score have significantly improved short-term survival for the sickest patient on the waiting list for liver transplantation; additionally, it does not have any significant impact in survival for the healthiest patient.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, a MELD cut-off value of 20 was chosen to verify the possible correlation between thromboelastographic reference range and MELD score. This cut-off is the most frequently used parameter in the literature for predicting mortality risk after LT[ 12 , 13 ]. Two TEG ® 5000 Hemostasis Analyzers (Haemoscope Inc., Skokie, Illinois, United States) were used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the MELD is the resource used to prioritize patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation. Research review conducted in three databases on this model of organ allocation with 30 items showed that the MELD score has significantly increased the short-term survival rate of the most serious patients of the waiting list for liver transplant, but had no significant impact on the survival rate of less serious patients (14) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Machado 15 , various studies attempted to relate this score to the post-transplant period and establish a cut-off point to guide the decision not to perform transplantation, despite the worst outcomes occurring with the higher MELD scores. But this was not possible 7 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major controversy following the implementation of MELD is the balance in organ allocation between reduced waitlist mortality and the best posttransplantation outcome [ 9 ]. Numerous studies have investigated, with varying results, the prognostic value of the MELD score for early and late posttransplant survival [ 3 , 10 , 11 ]. At our centre, the recipients with a MELD score between 20 and 29 received organs fulfilling at least one extended donor criterion significantly more frequently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MELD was calculated at the time of transplantation, as previously described [ 3 ], using the following objective variables: the serum creatinine, bilirubin, and INR levels. The minimum acceptable value for INR, creatinine, and bilirubin is 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%