2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10493-012-9547-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sampling procedure for quantifying mites in soybeans

Abstract: To control phytophagous mites on soybean crops in an economically viable way, it is necessary to quantify the occurrence of the mites on the leaflets. Estimating the number of mites cm(-2) on leaflets is more difficult because of their irregular distribution on the leaflet surface. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the count-area/leaflet and the number of soybean leaflets to quantify the mites. One hundred infested plants were randomly collected. One leaflet was removed from each plant and divi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For each of the faunistic indices and sampling methods, the sample size (number of quadrants) necessary to estimate the faunistic indices based on an estimation error of 20 % of the average with a 5 % error probability was estimated using the bootstrap resampling method (Efron, 1979) and applied as indicated in Storck et al (2012). In this procedure, 2,000 resamplings with replacements were repeated for different resamplings sizes or numbers of quadrants (k = 3, 4, ..., 300).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each of the faunistic indices and sampling methods, the sample size (number of quadrants) necessary to estimate the faunistic indices based on an estimation error of 20 % of the average with a 5 % error probability was estimated using the bootstrap resampling method (Efron, 1979) and applied as indicated in Storck et al (2012). In this procedure, 2,000 resamplings with replacements were repeated for different resamplings sizes or numbers of quadrants (k = 3, 4, ..., 300).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O tamanho de amostra foi obtido pelo método de reamostragem (EFRON, 1979;FERREIRA, 2005;STORCK et al, 2012). Esse método é adequado, tendo em vista que os valores do número de insetos por ponto (densidade populacional), em geral, não seguem distribuição de probabilidade conhecida ou não é a mesma para os diferentes ambientes, método de coleta e espécies (BARBOSA, 2001).…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…Para cada uma das 100 lavouras, cada método de coleta e cada espécie, foi estimada a média e determinado o tamanho de amostra pelo método de reamostragem (Efron 1979, Ferreira 2005, Storck et al 2012. Esse procedimento estatístico é adequado, tendo em vista que os valores do número de insetos por ponto (densidade populacional), em geral, não seguem distribuição de probabilidade conhecida ou não, e é a mesma para os diferentes ambientes, método de coleta e espécies (Barbosa 2001).…”
Section: Methodsunclassified