2018
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-18762018000300103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Run-Time Algorithm for Detecting Shill Bidding in Online Auctions

Abstract: Online auctions are a popular and convenient way to engage in ecommerce. However, the amount of auction fraud has increased with the rapid surge of users participating in online auctions. Shill bidding is the most prominent type of auction fraud where a seller submits bids to inflate the price of the item without the intention of winning. Mechanisms have been proposed to detect shill bidding once an auction has finished. However, if the shill bidder is not detected during the auction, an innocent bidder can po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The customer-to-customer (C2C) online auction is a form of e-commerce that has become increasing popular over recent years (McLaughlin et al, 2017). This popularity has been due to several important factors such as users' perceptions of its convenience (Verhagen and Dolen, 2011;Majadi et al, 2018), competitive pricing (Zhou et al, 2007) and ease of locating products and services (Weinberg and Davis, 2005) among others. Interestingly, some users view the enjoyment and experience of the bidding process as another important motivation (Rauniar et al, 2009).…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The customer-to-customer (C2C) online auction is a form of e-commerce that has become increasing popular over recent years (McLaughlin et al, 2017). This popularity has been due to several important factors such as users' perceptions of its convenience (Verhagen and Dolen, 2011;Majadi et al, 2018), competitive pricing (Zhou et al, 2007) and ease of locating products and services (Weinberg and Davis, 2005) among others. Interestingly, some users view the enjoyment and experience of the bidding process as another important motivation (Rauniar et al, 2009).…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have proposed various proposals depending on their objectives for detecting shill bidders in online auctions (i.e., statistical (Majadi and Trevathan, 2018a;Majadi et al, 2018b;Sadaoui and Wang, 2016;Sadaoui et al, 2015;Trevathan and Read, 2007b;Trevathan and Read, 2005), agent-based trust management system (Dong et al, 2009;Ford et al, 2009;Xu et al, 2008;Patel et al, 2007), machine learning (Ganguly and Sadaoui, 2018;Tsang et al, 2014a, Tsang et al, 2014bLei et al, 2012;Yoshida and Ohwada, 2010), neural network (Ford et al, 2012;Lin et al, 2012;Goel et al, 2010), data mining (Pandit et al, 2007;Chau et al, 2006;Shah et al, 2003), etc. ).…”
Section: Related Work On Collusive Shill Bidding Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classifier is used to detect shill bidding and take actions if any auction found infected. Majadi et al (2018a) proposed a run-time statistical approach, referred to as the Live Shill Score (LSS) algorithm, for detecting shill bidders in online auctions. The algorithm splits an auction into four time periods and examines each bidder's bidding behaviours at set points in time.…”
Section: Related Work On Collusive Shill Bidding Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%