IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2002.1025880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rule-based classifier using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) approach for urban landscape dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there are many machine learning approaches to classify the Earth's land surface, the classification and regression tree (CART) is ideal for land classification according to several previous studies (ManojKumar et al 2002;Xu et al 2005). To prepare the training data for the model, we generated reference areas to identify water, vegetation, human construction, and others (see example in Fig.…”
Section: The Green Space Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are many machine learning approaches to classify the Earth's land surface, the classification and regression tree (CART) is ideal for land classification according to several previous studies (ManojKumar et al 2002;Xu et al 2005). To prepare the training data for the model, we generated reference areas to identify water, vegetation, human construction, and others (see example in Fig.…”
Section: The Green Space Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of structure element (pixel or object), the classification model, and the extraction of texture features are treated as the key issues of a successful classification scheme. 23 Decision tree is another powerful classifier widely used in HSRRS applications, such as landscape mapping 24 and vegetation extracting in urban area. 22 For the classification model, support vector machine (SVM) is a valuable classifier widely used in the classification of HSRRS data for its ability to generalize well even with limited training samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pavuluri Manoj Kumar [21]comparison of CART and ML classifications for urban land cover showed that ML performs better than CART in this study area. CART can improve classification accuracy if there is a higher variance in the additional data used.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%