2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11075-016-0249-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A robust approach for finding all well-separated solutions of sparse systems of nonlinear equations

Abstract: Tearing is a long-established decomposition technique, widely adapted across many engineering fields. It reduces the task of solving a large and sparse nonlinear system of equations to that of solving a sequence of low-dimensional ones. The most serious weakness of this approach is well-known: It may suffer from severe numerical instability. The present paper resolves this flaw for the first time. The new approach requires reasonable bound constraints on the variables. The worst-case time complexity of the alg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further test cases will be performed to identify a limit for the number of tearing variables where the numerical costs are still reasonable low. Beside this, methods as the one of Baharev et al (2017) that systematically generate initial values close to the solution will be examined in order to provide a sufficient set of initial values for the tearing variables and achieve a certain level of efficiency during the iteration of a BBTF decomposed system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further test cases will be performed to identify a limit for the number of tearing variables where the numerical costs are still reasonable low. Beside this, methods as the one of Baharev et al (2017) that systematically generate initial values close to the solution will be examined in order to provide a sufficient set of initial values for the tearing variables and achieve a certain level of efficiency during the iteration of a BBTF decomposed system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. The algorithm of the present paper is a significant improvement over older algorithms discussed in [3, 4], both algorithmically and on the implementation level. The entire algorithm has been redesigned and rewritten from scratch, and in particular, the backsolve step is radically different.…”
Section: Overview Of the Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…2 is written, we try all the possible matches in a brute-force manner. The previous implementation of the algorithm also worked [3] this way. Numerical evidence shows that it can be very wasteful: If two distinct points in the point cloud are close in their components, it is very likely that the matches will have very similar objective value in (9) too; there is little to no benefit in trying both of them.…”
Section: Implementation Details Of the Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8.9.2, p. 442); the emphasis is ours. If we want to find all well-separated solutions of a nonlinear system of equations, the kind of applications discussed in (Baharev et al, 2016), this is unacceptable.…”
Section: Multivalued Elimination Stepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Staircase sampling was inspired by (Baharev and Neumaier, 2014), and proposed in (Baharev et al, 2016) to mitigate all of the issues listed in Sections 3 and 4. A detailed presentation of this method is outside the scope of this paper; here we only sketch the basic idea.…”
Section: A Novel Robust Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%