2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11846-020-00392-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A risk management perspective on CSR and the marginal cost of debt: empirical evidence from Europe

Abstract: This article investigates the association between CSR and marginal credit costs of European companies. We provide instance for a negative association based on a variety of model specifications and fine-grained measures for CSR. These results can be explained in light of the increasing relevance of socially responsible investors for financing costs of companies. We further apply the risk management perspective on CSR to the credit market and show that the insurance-like property of CSR is especially relevant fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
(155 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reputation is not constructed with raw information about the firm that stakeholders find for themselves (Fombrun 1996 2001 ; Zaheer and Bell 2005 ); rather, the information is filtered and validated by other users whose opinions we trust and by secondary stakeholders providing information that may either corroborate or undermine that issued by firm (Origgi 2018 ). This information may even go so far as to cancel out the positive effects of transparency between the firm and the market on the firm's competitive position (Kossovsky 2010 ) or to reduce financing costs (Kordsachia 2020 ). It is not easy to gain a reputation for quality, the loyalty of suppliers or the trust of customers.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reputation is not constructed with raw information about the firm that stakeholders find for themselves (Fombrun 1996 2001 ; Zaheer and Bell 2005 ); rather, the information is filtered and validated by other users whose opinions we trust and by secondary stakeholders providing information that may either corroborate or undermine that issued by firm (Origgi 2018 ). This information may even go so far as to cancel out the positive effects of transparency between the firm and the market on the firm's competitive position (Kossovsky 2010 ) or to reduce financing costs (Kordsachia 2020 ). It is not easy to gain a reputation for quality, the loyalty of suppliers or the trust of customers.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing body of academic literature investigates the influence of institutional investors as a key corporate governance mechanism that affects invested firms' nonfinancial performance (Dam and Scholtens 2012;Dyck et al 2019;Gloßner 2019;Kim et al 2019a;Xiang et al 2020). This specific investigation of institutional investors is a result of their greater influence on corporate decision-making in recent years (Shleifer and Vishny 1997;Aghion et al 2013;Sikavica et al 2018;Kordsachia 2020). Today, shares of the largest corporations around the world are owned by institutions rather than individuals (Dyck et al 2019).…”
Section: Content-driven Socially Responsible Investors and Corporate Environmental Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking into the originality and novelty of the present study, there are several studies which have covered several aspects in the different contexts of CSR and business performance (Ghardallou, 2022;Saeidi et al, 2015;Tiep et al, 2021), CSR and gender-related (Berényi & Deutsch, 2017;Birindelli et al, 2019;Lu, F. et al, 2021;Lu, J. et al, 2020;Tefera & He, 2020), CSR and employees related (Brieger et al, 2020;Jia et al, 2019;Kim & Scullion, 2013;Kunz, 2020), CSR and financial performance (Kim et al, 2018;Maqbool & Zameer, 2018), CSR and risk management (Chollet & Sandwidi, 2018;Kordsachia, 2020). A lot has been done in the area of CSR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%