2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2019.111152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on Raman finger prints of doping and strain effect in TMDCs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

6
59
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
6
59
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The electron doping effect can induce the frequency shifts of A 1g mode due to the strong electron–phonon interaction 47 . Consult to previous literature, the E 2g mode is not sensitive to the electron doping effect 47 , 48 . So it is assumed that the electron doping effect induced Raman shift of E 2g mode did not change with temperature, or the changes can be neglected.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The electron doping effect can induce the frequency shifts of A 1g mode due to the strong electron–phonon interaction 47 . Consult to previous literature, the E 2g mode is not sensitive to the electron doping effect 47 , 48 . So it is assumed that the electron doping effect induced Raman shift of E 2g mode did not change with temperature, or the changes can be neglected.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Thus, the generation of active Co IV species that can participate in a fast and efficient OER process should lead to the observed red-shift of the Raman signals. In contrast, blue-shifts in Raman signals usually suggest lattice contraction and charge redistribution 64 , 69 . Unlike the more active Co 3 O 4 /CeO 2 , the pure Co 3 O 4 catalyst would go through substantial charge-accumulation surface reconstruction (Co III Co IV ↔ Co IV Co IV ) at ~1.62 V around the onset for OER.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raman spectroscopy is an experimental technique which is directly sensitive to the crystal structure. [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ] Previous Raman spectroscopy studies of the bulk 1 T ′‐MoTe 2 crystals indicate that in the high‐temperature 1 T ′ phase at T ≥ 250 K upon cooling (or at T ≥ 260 K upon warming), the out‐of‐plane vibration mode D around 125 cm –1 is Raman in‐active (i.e., only infrared active) and is absent in the Raman spectra due to the centrosymmetry of the monoclinic 1 T ′ structure, while in the low‐temperature T d phase at T < 250 K upon cooling (or at T < 260 K upon warming), the out‐of‐plane vibration mode D becomes both Raman‐ and infrared‐active and can be probed by Raman spectroscopy owing to the centrosymmetry breaking in the orthorhombic T d structure (see the two vibration modes D and E in the Raman spectra of the MoTe 2 bulk crystal with the orthorhombic T d structure measured at T = 80 K in Figure 2 a , the vibration mode e in the Raman spectra of the MoTe 2 bulk crystal with the monoclinic 1 T ′ structure at T = 300 K in Figure 2b , and the Raman spectra of the MoTe 2 bulk crystal in the energy range from 60 to 300 cm –1 in Figure S1 , Supporting Information). [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ] Thus, the presence of the out‐of‐plane vibration mode D can be regarded as a spectroscopic signature of the temperature‐driven structural phase transition in MoTe 2 from the high‐temperature monoclinic 1 T ′ structure to the low‐temperature orthorhombic T d structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%