2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on non-model based diagnosis methodologies for PEM fuel cell stacks and systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
91
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several studies employ a model-based method for fuel cell diagnostics, i.e., developing a fuel cell model, and identifying fuel cell faults from residuals between model outputs and actual measurements [4][5][6][7][8], there are complexities in developing an accurate fuel cell model containing complete sets of failure modes. Data-driven approaches are more widely used for fuel cell diagnostics, that is, extracting the features by applying signal processing techniques to the sensor data, and discriminating fuel cell faults with extracted features [9][10][11][12][13]. Compared to fuel cell diagnostics, fewer studies have been devoted to fuel cell prognostics, and among these studies, training data from a fuel cell system is required to generate the input-output relationship of the fuel cell model for the prediction of future performance [14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several studies employ a model-based method for fuel cell diagnostics, i.e., developing a fuel cell model, and identifying fuel cell faults from residuals between model outputs and actual measurements [4][5][6][7][8], there are complexities in developing an accurate fuel cell model containing complete sets of failure modes. Data-driven approaches are more widely used for fuel cell diagnostics, that is, extracting the features by applying signal processing techniques to the sensor data, and discriminating fuel cell faults with extracted features [9][10][11][12][13]. Compared to fuel cell diagnostics, fewer studies have been devoted to fuel cell prognostics, and among these studies, training data from a fuel cell system is required to generate the input-output relationship of the fuel cell model for the prediction of future performance [14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the complexities, methods are developed to predict Fuel Cell State of Health (SoH) in terms of performance loss, degradation and, fault detection and isolation (FDI) [45,63,[74][75][76][77][78][79]. Diagnostic methods available are model or non-model based [71,[80][81][82][83][84]. Model-based methods are further classified as white, grey or black box depending on the nature of input and output.…”
Section: Pemfc Life Prediction Methods Under Aeronautic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, non-model based methods are simple, flexible, capable of dealing with nonlinear problems and do not require system structure knowledge. Non-model based methods are further grouped as artificial intelligence, statistical method or signal processing [82]. An emerging area of science called Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) focuses on methods that assess State of Health (SoH), predict Remaining Useful Lifetime (RUL) and decide mission achievement from mitigation actions [80,85].…”
Section: Pemfc Life Prediction Methods Under Aeronautic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations