2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2013.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
250
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 561 publications
(254 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
250
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Given a reciprocal preference relation on a set of alternatives, the concept of non-dominance degree introduced by Orlovsky [51] has been extensively used to rank the alternatives [10,23,38,61,63,65,66]. In the following, and in order to improve the understanding of the proposed correlation consensus degree, the consistency of the correlation consensus degree with Orlovsky's non-dominance degree is proved.…”
Section: Consistency Under Maximum Correlation Consensus Degreementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given a reciprocal preference relation on a set of alternatives, the concept of non-dominance degree introduced by Orlovsky [51] has been extensively used to rank the alternatives [10,23,38,61,63,65,66]. In the following, and in order to improve the understanding of the proposed correlation consensus degree, the consistency of the correlation consensus degree with Orlovsky's non-dominance degree is proved.…”
Section: Consistency Under Maximum Correlation Consensus Degreementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, establishing and characterising different methodologies to measure consensus have been addressed from a Social Choice perspective [1,3,13]. On the other hand, within the Decision Making Theory framework, modelling group decision making problems in order to reach a higher level of cohesiveness has been managed successfully [15,32,34,38,39,65]. Outside of these main areas, it is possible to find other methodologies that use the idea of consensus in different ways to the aforementioned ones, with [41,46] being representative examples of these methodologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…], it is preferable to include mechanism to check the agreement among the decision makers before obtaining a solution ensuring that enough agreement have been achieved. Those mechanisms are widely known as consensus processes [13] and they consist on iterative negotiations where the decision makers agree to change their testimonies following the advice given by a moderator, which calculates the agreement or consensus degree at each iteration [6]. If enough agreement have been reached the consensus process stops and the aggregation and the exploitation is carried out.…”
Section: Consensusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [18] a review of consensus models in a fuzzy environment can be found. There is, nowadays, a wide range of areas of application for these methods, from managerial to medical or engineering [6,8,10,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%