2014
DOI: 10.4236/me.2014.54036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Risk Management in Construction: Opportunities for Improvement

Abstract: To expand knowledge of a search on a particular topic or to gather a significant sample of information that allows the researcher to identify and analyze the current state of knowledge on a topic, this paper presents a structured process for the selection of academic papers, evidence of papers' relevance through bibliometric analysis, and analysis of the papers' contents to identify gaps in the knowledge related to the theme under consideration and the objectives of the researcher. Starting from an interest in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Web of Science and Scopus (Elsevier). We exclude from the bibliometric portfolio: books, book covers, duplicate works and outside the subject of this research (de Azevedo et al, 2014;Ensslin et al, 2017). No time filter was defined when querying the databases.…”
Section: The Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Web of Science and Scopus (Elsevier). We exclude from the bibliometric portfolio: books, book covers, duplicate works and outside the subject of this research (de Azevedo et al, 2014;Ensslin et al, 2017). No time filter was defined when querying the databases.…”
Section: The Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work can also be considered as qualitative and quantitative, since, in the first step, there was a qualitative selection to identify articles of bibliographic portfolio; and, in the second step, when data were analyzed as the number of publications and authors citations [16] [20].…”
Section: Methodological Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated in [2], the effects that the risks offer to civil construction companies have error margins that are considered harmful for the execution of planned activities, which can lead to the interruption or even the ruin of the project.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%