2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58689-2_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Developments and Applications in Item Analysis

Abstract: This chapter summarizes contributions ETS researchers have made concerning the applications of, refinements to, and developments in item analysis procedures. The focus is on dichotomously scored items, which allows for a simplified presentation that is consistent with the focus of the developments and which has straightforward applications to polytomously scored items. Item analysis procedures refer to a set of statistical measures used by testing experts to review and revise items, to estimate the characteris… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the benchmark of the possible underestimation in G was PMC while, perhaps, a coefficient called r-polyreg correlation, an r-polyserial estimated by regression correlation (Livinstone & Dorans, 2004) would be a more proper benchmark. This coefficient, developed to overcome the challenge of the obvious overestimation in biserial and polyserial correlation coefficient, does not exceed 1, nor does it rely on bivariate normality assumptions (see Moses, 2017). More studies may be valuable in this respect.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the benchmark of the possible underestimation in G was PMC while, perhaps, a coefficient called r-polyreg correlation, an r-polyserial estimated by regression correlation (Livinstone & Dorans, 2004) would be a more proper benchmark. This coefficient, developed to overcome the challenge of the obvious overestimation in biserial and polyserial correlation coefficient, does not exceed 1, nor does it rely on bivariate normality assumptions (see Moses, 2017). More studies may be valuable in this respect.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27% is a common criterion for dividing the ratio of high and low in psychological experiments. This method is named as high-low-27-percent group method [41]. Tables 2 to 4 show the F1-score results of BDI, SAI and TAI class, respectively.…”
Section: Evaluation and Analysis A Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Item difficulty indicates how many participants have answered an item above the mean of the scale. For items with multiple response options, item difficulty is calculated as follows: p=iitalicxikn (Bortz & Döring, 2013; Moses, 2017). Values for each item are summed up across participants ( x i ) and are divided by the number of participants ( n ) multiplied by the item response levels ( k ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%