A review of decision-support tools and performance measurement and sustainable supply chain management

Taticchi, Paolo; Garengo, Patrizia; Nudurupati, Sai S.; Tonelli, Flavio; Pasqualino, Roberto

doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.939239

Cited by 189 publications

(125 citation statements)

References 122 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

122

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…To this end, a systematic literature review in terms of the availability of suitable methods points towards the following claims: research claiming for the need for mixed methods research in RGSCM (Dubey et al, 2015;Faisal, 2016); research claiming for the need of quantitative based modelling & decision support in RGSCM (Heckmann, Comes & Nickel, 2015;Qazi et al, 2015;Taticchi et al, 2015); research claiming for the need of mixed methods when analyzing systems that include environment, society and cross-system innovation/ practice diffusion (Smith & Rupp, 2015;Soosay & Hyland, 2015).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Institutional Co-Creation Interfaces for Innovation Diffusion during Disaster Management

Solomon¹,

Ketikidis²,

Siavalas³

2017

MDKE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Institutional Co-Creation Interfaces for Innovation Diffusion during Disaster Management

Solomon¹,

Ketikidis²,

Siavalas³

2017

MDKE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The economic perspective, 279 within the subject, is the most documented performance metric, which almost all of 280 the sample papers mention. However, most consider traditional accounting 281 measurements of focal companies such as cost, revenue, and profitability to guide the 282 economic business decision (Taticchi et al, 2015). One opposition for such radical thinking may go as follows: if the authors succeed in 420 understanding a reverse causality from better economic performance to social and 421 environmental performance, does this to justify sacrificing environmental and social 422 welfare to economic benefits and therefore is it futile to concentrate on the social and 423 environmental aspects.…”

Section: Triple-bottom Line Perspective: 277mentioning

confidence: 99%

Inside out: The interrelationships of sustainable performance metrics and its effect on business decision making: Theory and practice

Gong

Simpson

Koh

et al. 2018

Resources, Conservation and Recycling

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. Abstract 20There has been an increasing interest in the use of decision-making models to achieve 21 sustainability goal in recent decades. However, a systematic review of performance 22 metrics, which are an important element of decision-making models to evaluate the 23 outcomes regarding firm's economic, environmental and social performance, is 24 lacking. This study provides critical reflections on the current state of literature and 25 industry development regarding sustainable performance metrics and offers concrete 26 suggestions to guide future research. This study contributes to existing studies by (1) 27 exploring the interrelationship between sustainable triple-bottom performance in the 28 decision making process; (2) integrating corporate governance mechanism into 29 decision making process for sustainable consideration; and (3) conducting a 30 comparison between academic theory and industry practice regarding the performance 31 metrics proposed and employed. 32 33 34 35 36

show abstract

“…First, it has been applied to several fields of study, such as business and management and economics, with interesting results [32][33][34][35].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable and Inclusive Food Systems through the Lenses of a Complex System Thinking Approach—A Bibliometric Review

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The multidimensionality and complexity of assuring food security in a sustainable and inclusive way requires us to think in systems. Yet, sector specific models or agricultural productivity models are not able by construction to represent the non-linearity and time-dependent nature of the relations underpinning the agri-food system. Two alternative modelling approaches, i.e., System Dynamics (SD) and Agent Based Models (ABM), gained increasing attention in particular after the food commodities prices spikes in 2007 thanks to the conceptual and structural advantages that they provide to the study of food system complexity. In this paper, we develop a first, rigorous bibliometric analysis based on pattern recognition analysis reviewing the peer review journal publications focused on agri-food systems. Using the ISIWeb of Science dataset provided by Thomson Reuters, we apply citation/co-citation semantic metrics to analyse publications from 1970 to 2016 in the field of agricultural models divided in two categories that we define as: (i) agricultural complex systems modelling (ACSM) that includes SD and ABM modelling exercised; and (ii) agricultural modelling (AM) that includes traditional approaches to agri-food systems modelling rooted on the neoclassical approach (e.g., Computable General Equilibrium Models and Partial Equilibrium Models). The publications are identified by applying a filter of specific keywords to the search. We then compare how both approaches appear in the literature looking at the number of publications and citations by scientific journals, identifying key authors and journals, their frequency, the impact factor and citations, and looking at their trend through time. Results show the prevalence of AM approaches for the analysis of the agri-food sector on one side, and the smaller but growing contribution of the ACSM community and literature on the other. We conclude by remarking the need for more systematic analyses on the contribution of the two approaches to the analysis of the complex dynamics and behaviour of agri-food systems to inform evidence-based policies for sustainable and inclusive agriculture.

show abstract

A review of decision-support tools and performance measurement and sustainable supply chain management

Cited by 189 publications

References 122 publications

Institutional Co-Creation Interfaces for Innovation Diffusion during Disaster Management

Institutional Co-Creation Interfaces for Innovation Diffusion during Disaster Management

Inside out: The interrelationships of sustainable performance metrics and its effect on business decision making: Theory and practice

Sustainable and Inclusive Food Systems through the Lenses of a Complex System Thinking Approach—A Bibliometric Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About