2000
DOI: 10.1136/gut.47.3.404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reproducible grading scale for histological assessment of inflammation in ulcerative colitis

Abstract: Background-Evaluation of histological activity in ulcerative colitis needs to be reproducible but has rarely been tested. This could be useful both clinically and in clinical trials. Aim-To develop reproducible criteria which are valid in the assessment of acute inflammation (activity) and chronicity, and to evaluate these features in an interobserver variability study. Methods-A six grade classification system for inflammation was developed which could also be fine tuned within each grade. The grades were: 0,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
654
1
26

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 815 publications
(691 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
10
654
1
26
Order By: Relevance
“…No patients with post-infectious colitis were included. Group 2 included 20 patients (10 men and 10 women, age range: 21-50, mean: 39.5 years) with active UC with an average duration of 5.9 years (range: 0.5-25 years) and activity estimated using the histological scoring system according to Geboes et al (Geboes et al 2000) amounting to 4.3 in 14 patients and 5.3 in the remaining 6 patients. Group 3 included 12 patients (6 men and 6 women, age range: 15-42, mean: 28.6 years) with active CD with an average duration of 4.2 years (range: 0.5-34 years) and an average clinical activity CDAI score of over 150 points (Best et al 1976).…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No patients with post-infectious colitis were included. Group 2 included 20 patients (10 men and 10 women, age range: 21-50, mean: 39.5 years) with active UC with an average duration of 5.9 years (range: 0.5-25 years) and activity estimated using the histological scoring system according to Geboes et al (Geboes et al 2000) amounting to 4.3 in 14 patients and 5.3 in the remaining 6 patients. Group 3 included 12 patients (6 men and 6 women, age range: 15-42, mean: 28.6 years) with active CD with an average duration of 4.2 years (range: 0.5-34 years) and an average clinical activity CDAI score of over 150 points (Best et al 1976).…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colitis severity scores were assessed in a blinded fashion by a single pathologist (E.S.S.) according to a previously described scoring system (38).…”
Section: Dss Colitis Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to accurately evaluate intestinal mucosa infl ammation in the management of these patients, particularly for the assessment of therapeutic effectiveness. Colonoscopy and biopsy are useful in the assessment of intestinal mucosa inflammation of patients with UC, but these examinations can be a heavy burden to the patient [2,3] . Clinical evaluations including laboratory tests such as C-reactive protein (CRP) [4][5][6] , erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) [7] , acid glycoprotein (AGP) [8] , and platelet count [9,10] , have been used for the determination of disease activity of UC, but none of them are specifi c for gut infl ammation [11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%