2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Repressor Complex Governs the Integration of Flowering Signals in Arabidopsis

Abstract: Multiple genetic pathways act in response to developmental cues and environmental signals to promote the floral transition, by regulating several floral pathway integrators. These include FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1 (SOC1). We show that the flowering repressor SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE (SVP) is controlled by the autonomous, thermosensory, and gibberellin pathways, and directly represses SOC1 transcription in the shoot apex and leaf. Moreover, FT expression in the leaf is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
482
3
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 425 publications
(507 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
14
482
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Though there is a second GI homoeolog in both papaya and grape, they are highly diverged. Likewise, SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE (SVP), a floral repressor in the thermosensory pathway 39 , has only two Brassica orthologs, likely produced by the recent WGT, and low copy number in other plants with the few paralogs being highly diverged in sequence (e.g. <53% similarity in protein sequences) (Fig S7.2F5).…”
Section: Stabilizing the Genome Of A Mesohexaploidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though there is a second GI homoeolog in both papaya and grape, they are highly diverged. Likewise, SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE (SVP), a floral repressor in the thermosensory pathway 39 , has only two Brassica orthologs, likely produced by the recent WGT, and low copy number in other plants with the few paralogs being highly diverged in sequence (e.g. <53% similarity in protein sequences) (Fig S7.2F5).…”
Section: Stabilizing the Genome Of A Mesohexaploidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under short days, SOC1 appears also to be the major integrator of flowering time stimulation in response to the phytohormone GA (Blázquez and Weigel, 1999;Moon et al, 2003). SOC1 expression is furthermore repressed by the MADS box transcription factor FLOWERING LOCUS C, which controls flowering in response to long cold periods (vernalization) and acts together with the MADS box transcription factor SHORT VEGETA-TIVE PHASE (Hartmann et al, 2000;Li et al, 2008;Tao et al, 2012). Additionally, SOC1 expression is controlled by an age-dependent regulatory system that involves SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE (SPL) transcription factors and their antagonistic micro-RNA regulator miRNA156 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-distance movement of FT protein from leaves to the shoot apex through the phloem system allows FT to interact with a bZIP transcription factor FD in the shoot apical meristem for activating floral meristem identity genes 10,12,13 . SOC1 is expressed in leaves and shoot apical meristems in response to multiple flowering pathways, and encodes a MADS-box transcription factor that acts as a key flowering promoter through regulating another floral meristem identity gene, LEAFY 2-5, [14][15][16] . Although several studies indicate that CO activates SOC1 either directly or indirectly via FT in the photoperiod pathway 3,10,17,18 , so far there is no evidence to support direct regulation of SOC1 transcription by CO or FT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%