2016
DOI: 10.1080/13685538.2016.1246525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reliability generalization meta-analysis of coefficient alpha and test–retest coefficient for the aging males’ symptoms (AMS) scale

Abstract: The AMS scale and the three subscales had fairly good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Future psychometric studies of the AMS scale should report important characteristics of the participants, details of item scores, and test-retest reliability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[44][45][46] Therefore, rather than performing biochemical tests alone, studies should use questionnaires such as the Aging Male Symptoms (AMS) since the latter are very useful in treating hypogonadism and examine various clinical symptoms. 47 However, our study did not use AMS to examine TD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[44][45][46] Therefore, rather than performing biochemical tests alone, studies should use questionnaires such as the Aging Male Symptoms (AMS) since the latter are very useful in treating hypogonadism and examine various clinical symptoms. 47 However, our study did not use AMS to examine TD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AMS scale had internal consistency (α = 0.89 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.90)); the mean alpha estimates across the AMS subscales ranged from 0.79 to 0.82. The AMS scale also had good test-retest reliability (r = 0.85 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.88)); the test-retest reliability coefficients of the AMS subscales ranged from 0.76 to 0.83 66. AMS is a standardised scale according to psychometric norms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%