2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-4257(01)00250-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A refined empirical line approach for reflectance factor retrieval from Landsat-5 TM and Landsat-7 ETM+

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the empirical line method (Moran et al 2001 and references within the article) was used to derive an atmospheric correction of the ALI image. The empirical line method requires knowledge about reflectance of at least one target within an image (Moran et al 2001). This target reflectance may be measured during image acquisition or estimated from historical data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the empirical line method (Moran et al 2001 and references within the article) was used to derive an atmospheric correction of the ALI image. The empirical line method requires knowledge about reflectance of at least one target within an image (Moran et al 2001). This target reflectance may be measured during image acquisition or estimated from historical data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods and/or correction coefficients have been published for many radiometric correction techniques, including conversion to top-ofatmosphere reflectance (Chander and Markham 2003;Chander et al 2007), dark-object subtraction (Chavez 1988;Teillet and Fedosejevs 1995), measuring or estimating atmospheric aerosols to derive surface reflectance (Liang et al 2001;Thome 2001), applying radiative transfer functions (Moran et al 1992), empirical line calibration (Moran et al 2001), and haze removal (Richter 1996). More detailed reviews and summaries of radiometric image processing entailing terminology, sensor radiometric calibration, surface reflectance retrieval, image normalisation, and topographic corrections are available from Richards and Jia (1999), Liang et al (2001Liang et al ( , 2002, Peddle et al (2003), Schaepman-Strub et al (2006), and Vanonckelen et al (2013).…”
Section: What Sensors Are Available?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landsat 7 ETM+ data (30 m spatial resolution) were collected for the study area on 25 July 2001. All image data were converted to at-satellite exo-atmospheric reflectance, a temporally comparable surface reflectance factor (Moran et al, 2001), following procedures outlined by NASA (2002) and Taylor (2005). Furthermore, the Landsat 7 ETM+ data were georeferenced to the same planimetric database as the IKONOS data (i.e., Universal Transverse Mercator, zone 15N, North American Datum 1983) with an overall root-mean-square (rms) error of approximately 8 m.…”
Section: Remote Sensing Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%