2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3001626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Real-Time Collision Avoidance System for Autonomous Surface Vessel Using Fuzzy Logic

Abstract: Numerous researches have been done to develop ASV (Autonomous Surface Vessel) collision avoidance systems. Most of the systems used static methods but did not apply a knowledge base where solutions can be reused and adapted to solve a new case. In this paper, an algorithm of autonomous collision avoidance is proposed considering steering dynamic for ASV. The process of this learning method is to recall the FCBR (Fuzzy Case Base Reasoning) containing basic expert knowledge in the form of stored cases. The solut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researches [4][5][6] generally applied the ship motion models to simulate the real motion, while the decision and the control part are essentially separated, the maneuverability are ignored. The large inertia and the time lag still have an impact on autonomous navigation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Researches [4][5][6] generally applied the ship motion models to simulate the real motion, while the decision and the control part are essentially separated, the maneuverability are ignored. The large inertia and the time lag still have an impact on autonomous navigation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large angle crossing situation problem is eliminated. The rudder turning are improved according to the collision rule constrains, with only 5 cases (6,12,14,18,20) turning to left. Our analysis is that the targeted ship is on the right side and too close to the own ship (e.g., in case 6, 12, 14, the initial targeted ship is in less than 1 nm, in case 18 and 20 the nearest targeted ship is in less than 2 nm).…”
Section: Multiple Shipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few years, USV collision avoidance path planning has attracted extensive attention from both the academia and industry, and the algorithms can be generally classified into two categories. One is to treat USVs as autonomous mobile robots and use model-driven or data-driven approaches for path planning, such as artificial potential fields [ 7 , 8 ], fuzzy logic [ 9 , 10 ] and the velocity obstacle method [ 11 ]. These strategies could be very useful in dynamic situations in open water areas for obstacle avoidance, as USVs are only seen as agile robotic systems without marine navigation restrictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best knowledge of the authors, there are limited studies that consider nonlinear dynamic information of ships or that integrate collision avoidance algorithms with a nonlinear controller. Korean researchers, in June 2020, proposed a method that integrates a collision avoidance methodology with a simplified nonlinear ship model-the Noorbin mathematic model: T .. r + r + αr 3 = Kδ, where δ is the rudder angle, r is the angular deflection rate, and T, K, and α are parameters of ship dynamics [10]. Although the simplified nonlinear ship model was used, this paper is still a rare example to be applied in the collision avoidance design of ships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%