1932
A Rare Osseous Dystrophy (Morquio)
Abstract: The excuse for reporting a single case lies, in this instance, in the twofold fact that it is unique in our experience, and that we have been able to find but one other apparently identical case in the literature.For about eight years, or since he was 10 months old, a boy with a striking general deformity of the body has been in and out of our clinic at the Children's Memorial Hospital. From the start an object of curiosity, he became increasingly so as he grew older and the deformities became more evident ( f…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
19
1
0
0
Citation Types
1
1
0
0
Year Published
1933
1960
Publication Types
Select...
18
1
Relationship
0
19
Authors
Journals
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
References 0 publications
1
1
0
0
“…Ruggles (1931) found thyroid and pituitary extracts to be of no value and in the present case, as in the one reported by Meyer and Brenneman (1932), vitamin D preparations caused no improvement. In Barnett's case (1933) osteotomy resulted in some improvement in walking.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Ruggles (1931) found thyroid and pituitary extracts to be of no value and in the present case, as in the one reported by Meyer and Brenneman (1932), vitamin D preparations caused no improvement. In Barnett's case (1933) osteotomy resulted in some improvement in walking.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Since 1929 reports of nine families have appeared in each of which two or more children have been affected in the same way (Ruggles, 1931 ;Barnett, 1933;Coward and Nemir, 1933 ;Davis and Currier, 1934 ;Valentin, 1930 ;Brown, 1933;Giraud and Bert, 1935 ;Summerfeldt and Brown, 1936). In addition six nonfamilial cases have been reported by Ruggles (1931), Meyer and Brenneman (1932), Sainz de los Terreros (1934), Freeman (1938 and Guerin and Lachapele (1938).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
