2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00889-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized trial comparing heater probe plus thrombin with heater probe plus placebo for bleeding peptic ulcer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A larger high-quality study found that injection of thrombin plus heater probe was not better than heater probe alone ( 71 ). Th us, although limited information suggests that epinephrine followed by thermal contact therapy may be more effi cacious than thermal therapy alone, data are insufficient to recommend that thermal contact devices should not be used alone as monotherapy.…”
Section: Epinephrine Therapy Should Not Be Used Alone If Used It Shmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A larger high-quality study found that injection of thrombin plus heater probe was not better than heater probe alone ( 71 ). Th us, although limited information suggests that epinephrine followed by thermal contact therapy may be more effi cacious than thermal therapy alone, data are insufficient to recommend that thermal contact devices should not be used alone as monotherapy.…”
Section: Epinephrine Therapy Should Not Be Used Alone If Used It Shmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 A separate class of injectable agents includes thrombin, fibrin, and cyanoacrylate glues, which are used to create a primary tissue seal at a bleeding site. 37 With the exception of dilute epinephrine, injectable agents are not commonly used in the treatment of non-variceal UGIB.…”
Section: Injectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malgré l'absence d'hémostase endoscopique dans notre étude, le taux de mortalité observé dans cette étude paraît similaire ou moins élevé par rapport aux résultats des études n'ayant pas sélectionné les malades (1 à 7 %) [18,39,40]. En revanche, dans les études visant à déterminer l'efficacité de l'hémostase endoscopique chez des malades à haut risque de récidive, des taux nettement plus élevés ont été observés [4,8,16,21,24,41,42]. Ces résultats sont confirmés par des travaux ayant étudié les facteurs prédictifs de décès dans une population hypersélectionnée [4,8,16,43].…”
Section: Analyse Statistiqueunclassified