1993
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.129.7.859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized prospective study of a hydroactive dressing vs conventional treatment after shave biopsy excision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Goodness‐of‐fit tests revealed that hazard ratios could not be assumed constant over time, indicating that wound healing is dynamic, and not linear over time. We, therefore, investigated the likelihood of healing in the following three periods: (1) within the first 3 weeks of therapy, during which superficial, nonproblematic, uncomplicated wounds were expected to heal; (2) 3 weeks–3 months of therapy, representing the intermediate period, in which superficial, uncomplicated, fast‐healing wounds were no longer included, and the wound chronicity is not completely established; and (3) after 3 months’ therapy, representing established chronicity . There was no significant evidence against the extended Cox model, and it was thus used for further analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goodness‐of‐fit tests revealed that hazard ratios could not be assumed constant over time, indicating that wound healing is dynamic, and not linear over time. We, therefore, investigated the likelihood of healing in the following three periods: (1) within the first 3 weeks of therapy, during which superficial, nonproblematic, uncomplicated wounds were expected to heal; (2) 3 weeks–3 months of therapy, representing the intermediate period, in which superficial, uncomplicated, fast‐healing wounds were no longer included, and the wound chronicity is not completely established; and (3) after 3 months’ therapy, representing established chronicity . There was no significant evidence against the extended Cox model, and it was thus used for further analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also found that, in both types of wounds, hydrocolloid occlusive dressings decreased pain and did not increase the risk of infection compared to the control dressing, which was a standard adhesive bandage placed over antibiotic ointment. 20 Phillips et al 21 conducted a similar study a few years later, treating partial-thickness biopsy wounds with either a hydrocolloid dressing or a standard adhesive bandage and antibiotic ointment, and they found no difference in healing time. The reason for the differing findings of the two studies is not clear, although different hydrocolloids were used by each group.…”
Section: Issues Regarding the Clinical Use Of Occlusive Dressingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phillips et al 21 conducted a similar study a few years later, treating partial‐thickness biopsy wounds with either a hydrocolloid dressing or a standard adhesive bandage and antibiotic ointment, and they found no difference in healing time. The reason for the differing findings of the two studies is not clear, although different hydrocolloids were used by each group.…”
Section: Issues Regarding the Clinical Use Of Occlusive Dressingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings led to the use of prophylactic topical antibiotics as part of the standard of care for surgical procedures. Today, most directions for wound care after minor procedures (i.e., shave biopsy) include cleaning of the site, application of a topical antibiotic ointment, and covering with a dressing (20,21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%