2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2015.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized, Open-Label Phase II Trial of Volasertib as Monotherapy and in Combination With Standard-Dose Pemetrexed Compared With Pemetrexed Monotherapy in Second-Line Treatment for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the combination schedule did not demonstrate superior clinical efficacy compared with pemetrexed monotherapy. The response rate in patients treated with the combination (21.3%) was double of that in patients treated with pemetrexed monotherapy (10.6%), but no significant difference in PFS was observed between both treatment arms (3.3 months for combination vs. 5.3 months for pemetrexed monotherapy) …”
Section: Clinical Trials With Volasertibmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the combination schedule did not demonstrate superior clinical efficacy compared with pemetrexed monotherapy. The response rate in patients treated with the combination (21.3%) was double of that in patients treated with pemetrexed monotherapy (10.6%), but no significant difference in PFS was observed between both treatment arms (3.3 months for combination vs. 5.3 months for pemetrexed monotherapy) …”
Section: Clinical Trials With Volasertibmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The response rate in patients treated with the combination (21.3%) was double of that in patients treated with pemetrexed monotherapy (10.6%), but no significant difference in PFS was observed between both treatment arms (3.3 months for combination vs. 5.3 months for pemetrexed monotherapy). 95 Furthermore, a phase I/II study evaluated the effectiveness of the Plk1 inhibitor in combination with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in patients with AML ineligible for intensive induction therapy. In the phase I part of the trial, dose escalation was performed in patients with relapsed/refractory AML to determine MTD of volasertib combined with LDAC (32 patients) or as monotherapy (56 patients).…”
Section: Clinical Trials With Volasertib In Combination Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical benefit is currently being validated in a phase III trial (POLO-AML-2, see Supplementary Information S1 (table)). In contrast, several phase II clinical trials for patients with solid tumours showed disappointing results with lack of sufficient clinical activity 218220 . Future clinical application will depend on identification of biomarkers that can predict clinical response.…”
Section: Targeting Of Other Cell Cycle Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 26 clinical trials with Volasertib have been reported (reviewed in Van den bossche et al) either using it alone or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents . In the most advanced trials, Volasertib has been assayed against AML (NCT01721876), nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC; NCT00824408), ovarian cancer (NCT01121406), and urothelial cancer (NCT01023958) . With respect to the potential use of Volasertib against solid tumors several clinical trials have been completed (NCT01348347, NCT01145885, NCT00969761, among others), but still none have reached phase II.…”
Section: Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%