2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized ‘N-of-1’ single blinded clinical trial of barbed dermal sutures vs. smooth sutures in elective plastic surgery shows differences in scar appearance two-years post-operatively

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Scar cosmesis in wounds closed with unidirectional barbed sutures is also comparable or superior to that of standard sutures in studies involving blinded evaluators [4, 11]. The results of our study similarly suggest that, at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, there is no significant difference in mean cosmesis scores between wounds closed with barbed sutures and wounds closed with standard sutures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Scar cosmesis in wounds closed with unidirectional barbed sutures is also comparable or superior to that of standard sutures in studies involving blinded evaluators [4, 11]. The results of our study similarly suggest that, at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, there is no significant difference in mean cosmesis scores between wounds closed with barbed sutures and wounds closed with standard sutures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Decreased width of scar leads to a better aesthetic outcome. A study by Koide et al displayed a significantly better aesthetic outcome in the barbed suture group than nonbarbed suture group [3]. But in our study, there was no statistically significant difference in scar cosmesis as compared by Vancouver scar scale and POSAS (observer and patient scar scale) between the barbed and the non-barbed suture groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…In our study the time taken for barbed suture was less than conventional absorbable sutures and the difference was statistically significant. Similar results were seen in studies done by Koide et al, Kristen Aliano et al, Grigoryants et al, Jeremy P. Warner et al and Blacam et al [3,4,[7][8][9]. Jandali et al, found that using barbed sutures reduced the operative time of unilateral breast reconstruction significantly, but no significant difference was seen in the operative time of bilateral breast reconstruction [10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Koide et al described how barbed sutures can produce better aesthetic outcomes compared to smooth sutures in regards to the final appearance of the scar. 16 A disadvantage of this method is the fairly high cost of barbed sutures. However, this technique is cost-effective in This may partially offset this increased cost.…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantages Of This Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%