Recently released international guidelines on the management of hypertension reclassify hypertension and reappraise the previously established blood pressure (BP) goals and targets. 1,2 The 2018 European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology (ESH/ESC) guidelines, for example, recommend that in the vast majority of hypertensives, on-treatment BP should be targeted to levels <130/80 mm Hg, provided that intensive antihypertensive therapy is well-tolerated. 2 These lower BP goals are recommended for hypertensives at any level of cardiovascular risk and regardless of the presence or absence of established cardiovascular disease. 2 Support to these guideline recommendations is provided by "hard" clinicaltrial evidence showing that compared with a standard systolic BP target of <140 mm Hg, intensive therapy targeting to lower systolic BP <120 mm Hg offers additive cardiovascular risk reduction. 3 Wide use of combination therapy-preferably single-pill combinations-is recommended as a principle strategy to enhance adherence to the prescribed antihypertensive regimen, overcome therapeutic inertia and facilitate the achievement of these lower BP targets. 1,2 In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Hypertension, Xu et al 4 report the results of a prespecified sub-analysis of an open-label, randomized, controlled trial comparing the effect of low-dose, single-pill combination of valsartan/amlodipine (80/5 mg/day) versus nifedipine GITS (30 mg/day) on ambulatory BP and arterial stiffness. According to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, this sub-analysis enrolled 150 hypertensives with uncontrolled office BP, despite the administration of monotherapy for at least 4 weeks prior to study enrollment. Over a-12-week-long follow-up, in the overall population, valsartan/amlodipine combination was not superior to monotherapy with nifedipine GITS in lowering 24-hour ambulatory BP (betweengroup difference: −2.1/-1.7 mm Hg, P > 0.20). 4 Combination therapy with valsartan/amlodipine exerted a more potent BP-lowering action during night-time than during day-time. In subgroup analysis stratified according to the dipping status, combination therapy was superior to monotherapy in lowering night-time BP in non-dippers, but not in dippers. 4 When the analysis was stratified according to the ambulatory BP control status of participants at baseline, the BP-lowering effect of combination therapy was similar to that of monotherapy in the subgroup of white-coat uncontrolled hypertension. By contrast, in those with sustained uncontrolled hypertension, combination therapy lowered more effectively 24-hour ambulatory BP relative to monotherapy (between-group difference: −4.9/-3.8 mm Hg, P < 0.05). Valsartan/amlodipine combination therapy was also associated with improvement in arterial stiffness, assessed by measuring brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (PWV). 4 Interpretation of the above findings requires a careful evaluation of the study design and participant characteristics. The absence of a statistically significant benefit of low...