2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2008.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized controlled trial of homeopathic treatment of weaned piglets in a commercial swine herd

Abstract: Animals receiving sucrose saline alone and sucrose saline with homeopathy had less weight loss than control (p=0.017, p=0.0001 respectively). There was no statistical difference in relation to overall incidence of diarrhea or food consumption. These data suggest that the supplementation with sucrose saline with added homeopathic medicine in the first seven days post-weaning may be an useful option to reduce weight loss in weaned piglets.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons listed for application of homeopathic remedies were predominantly prevention (n=10). Three studies addressed fertility disorders in sows (Day 1984, Seifert 1987, Drösemeier 1989), three dealt with respiratory infections (Schütte 1991 [two trials], Albrecht and Schütte 1999) and three with diarrhoea (Soto and others 2008, Coelho and others 2009, Camerlink and others 2010), while two focused on growth promotion(Guajardo-Bernal and others 1996, Da Silva and others 2011) and one simply aimed for a good general health (Schütte 2003). The three disease complexes mentioned are among the most common reasons for the use of antibiotics on pig farms in practice (Christensen and others 1995, Petersen and others 2008).…”
Section: Species-specific Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reasons listed for application of homeopathic remedies were predominantly prevention (n=10). Three studies addressed fertility disorders in sows (Day 1984, Seifert 1987, Drösemeier 1989), three dealt with respiratory infections (Schütte 1991 [two trials], Albrecht and Schütte 1999) and three with diarrhoea (Soto and others 2008, Coelho and others 2009, Camerlink and others 2010), while two focused on growth promotion(Guajardo-Bernal and others 1996, Da Silva and others 2011) and one simply aimed for a good general health (Schütte 2003). The three disease complexes mentioned are among the most common reasons for the use of antibiotics on pig farms in practice (Christensen and others 1995, Petersen and others 2008).…”
Section: Species-specific Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight recorded differed between the groups within the study period, but as there was no control group, no clear outcome could be concluded. Studies by Soto and others (2008), Coelho and others (2009) and Camerlink and others (2010) aimed to prevent diarrhoea in piglets. Coelho and others (2009) and Camerlink and others (2010) performed a double and single blind RCT, respectively.…”
Section: Species-specific Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several studies present data that homeopathic remedies are not operating though a placebo response. Several reports, for example, show that homeopathic remedies are effective in treating infants, comatose patients and animals [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] induce oestrus in cows [14]. Another report has shown that homeopathic remedies might be trigger cytolytic activity in breast cancer cells maintained in culture [15].…”
Section: Ethical and Regulatory Issues Regarding Homeopathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In broiler chicken, thymulin 5CH offered into the drinking water since the first day of life improved the weight gain, survival, and productivity indexes at slaughter time [13]. Important to point out that offering homeopathic medicines into the drinking water represents a good, cheap, and easy tool to treat farm animals [20]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%