A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of Different Mobile Messaging Interventions for Problem Drinking Compared to Weekly Drink Tracking

Abstract

IntroductionRecent evidence suggests that text messaging may help to reduce problem drinking as an extension to in-person services, but very little is known about the effectiveness of remote messaging on problem drinking as a stand-alone intervention, or how different types of messages may improve drinking outcomes in those seeking to moderate their alcohol consumption.MethodsWe conducted an exploratory, single-blind randomized controlled pilot study comparing four different types of alcohol reduction-themed text messages sent daily to weekly drink self-tracking texts in order to determine their impact on drinking outcomes over a 12-week period in 152 participants (≈ 30 per group) seeking to reduce their drinking on the internet. Messaging interventions included: weekly drink self-tracking mobile assessment texts (MA), loss-framed texts (LF), gain-framed texts (GF), static tailored texts (ST), and adaptive tailored texts (TA). Poisson and least squares regressions were used to compare differences between each active messaging group and the MA control.ResultsWhen adjusting for baseline drinking, participants in all messaging groups except GF significantly reduced the number of drinks consumed per week and the number of heavy drinking days compared to MA. Only the TA and GF groups were significantly different from MA in reducing the number of drinking days. While the TA group yielded the largest effect sizes on all outcome measures, there were no significant differences between active messaging groups on any outcome measure. 79.6% of individuals enrolled in the study wanted to continue receiving messages for an additional 12 weeks at the end of the study.DiscussionResults of this pilot study indicate that remote automated text messages delivered daily can help adult problem drinkers reduce drinking frequency and quantity significantly more than once-a-week self-tracking messages only, and that tailored adaptive texts yield the largest effect sizes across outcomes compared to MA. Larger samples are needed to understand differences between messaging interventions and to target their mechanisms of efficacy.

Alcohol‐related head and neck cancer: Summary of the literature

“…A further review indicates that electronic‐based interventions are effective to reduce alcohol use in populations other than HNC. For example, Muench et al found that daily automated texts can help problem drinkers reduce drinking frequency and quantity significantly more than weekly self‐tracking messages. A meta‐analytic review of 28 electronic intervention trials for alcohol misuse and alcohol use disorders shows a small reduction in consumption (approximately 1 drink per week) in adults and college students at 6 months.…”

EMMA: An Emotion-Aware Wellbeing Chatbot

“…There are endless subtleties in designing automated text interventions for mental health purposes. Tailoring [27] and diversifying [28] messages have shown potential for improving efficacy and reducing habituation. Sender, stimulus type, delivery medium, heterogeneity, timing of delivery, frequency, intensity, the trigger's target, structure, narrative [29], and the linguistic content of messages [30] are among the variables that need to be optimized for the purpose of the intervention.…”

Older adults and mobile technology: Factors that enhance and inhibit utilization in the context of behavioral health

“…For example, a mHealth intervention might be offered via multiple modalities, such as text message, email or calendar reminder. Like the general population [109], tailoring to the unique needs of each older adult maximizes engagement and efficacy [35].…”