2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05617.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Random Walk through Models of Nonlinear Clustering

Abstract: : A few simple models of the mass function of collapsed objects are presented. The emphasis is on apparently unrelated models which end up giving the same answer for the number density and merger histories of virialized clumps. Models of the spatial distribution of the clumps and how they can be used to model the spatial distribution of the mass are briefly discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the form of n eff dependence modelled in peaks theory (e.g. Sheth 2001) predicts a smaller difference between the numbers of high‐ and low‐redshift haloes than we find in our simulations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Interestingly, the form of n eff dependence modelled in peaks theory (e.g. Sheth 2001) predicts a smaller difference between the numbers of high‐ and low‐redshift haloes than we find in our simulations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Carefully accounting for clouds in clouds in the peak formalism is a nontrivial problem even though, in a first approximation, we may simply enforce that the height of the peak be less than sc on scale R S þ dR S [132,133]. Figure 1 of [80] demonstrates that this substantially improves the agreement with the measured halo abundances at * 3 but underestimates the counts at & 2. Furthermore, adding this extra constraint also modifies the peak bias factors and, possibly, theb II -independent terms in Eq.…”
Section: E Scale Dependence Across the Acoustic Peakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peak abundances, profiles, and correlation functions in real and redshift space have been studied in the literature [36,[65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75]. Some of these results have been used to interpret the abundance and clustering of rich clusters [42,[76][77][78][79][80], constrain the power spectrum of mass fluctuations [81,82], and study evolution bias [83] and assembly bias [84].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then compared the number of structures with M members (N M ) with the expectation value using the toy model of Sheth (2001). Within the data set, the number of systems with M 4 30 < < galaxies identified using the Friends-of-friends algorithm always exceeded the expected, Poissonian value in our analysis.…”
Section: Confirmation Tests Of Structurementioning
confidence: 99%