2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9e89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Radio Continuum and Polarization Study of SNR G57.2+0.8 Associated with Magnetar SGR 1935+2154

Abstract: We present a radio continuum and linear polarization study of the Galactic supernova remnant G57.2+0.8, which may host the recently discovered magnetar SGR 1935+2154. The radio SNR shows the typical radio continuum spectrum of a mature supernova remnant with a spectral index of α = −0.55 ± 0.02 and moderate polarized intensity. Magnetic field vectors indicate a tangential magnetic field, expected for an evolved SNR, in one part of the SNR and a radial magnetic field in the other. The latter can be explained by… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
73
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
12
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequent discovery of the coherent X-ray pulsations of SGR 1935+2154with the Chandra X-ray Observatory established the spin period of the magnetar,  P 3.2 s (Israel et al 2014(Israel et al , 2016. Observations of the source with XMM-Newton and NuSTAR during outburst in 2015 provided the magnetar's spin-down rate,  ´--P 1.43 10 s s 11 1 , which implies a surface dipolar magnetic field B 2.2 10 G 14 , spin-down luminosity Ĺ 1.7 10 sd 34 erg s −1 , and characteristic spin-down age   P P 2 3600 yr. We note, however, that the age estimate based on the SNR association, 16 kyr, is significantly older (Zhou et al 2020; see also Kothes et al 2018). This discrepancy between the dipolar and SNR age estimates is similar to the one observed in the other magnetar associated with an SNR, Swift J1834.9-0846 (Granot et al 2017; with a spin-down age of 4.9 kyr and an SNR age between 5 and 100 kyr).…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsequent discovery of the coherent X-ray pulsations of SGR 1935+2154with the Chandra X-ray Observatory established the spin period of the magnetar,  P 3.2 s (Israel et al 2014(Israel et al , 2016. Observations of the source with XMM-Newton and NuSTAR during outburst in 2015 provided the magnetar's spin-down rate,  ´--P 1.43 10 s s 11 1 , which implies a surface dipolar magnetic field B 2.2 10 G 14 , spin-down luminosity Ĺ 1.7 10 sd 34 erg s −1 , and characteristic spin-down age   P P 2 3600 yr. We note, however, that the age estimate based on the SNR association, 16 kyr, is significantly older (Zhou et al 2020; see also Kothes et al 2018). This discrepancy between the dipolar and SNR age estimates is similar to the one observed in the other magnetar associated with an SNR, Swift J1834.9-0846 (Granot et al 2017; with a spin-down age of 4.9 kyr and an SNR age between 5 and 100 kyr).…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…The source is associated with supernova remnant (SNR) G57.2+0.8 (Gaensler 2014). Distance estimates are uncertain, ranging from 4.4 to 12.5 kpc (Sun et al 2011;Pavlović et al 2013;Kothes et al 2018;Mereghetti et al 2020a;Zhou et al 2020), and throughout this paper, we adopt a distance of = d d 10 kpc…”
Section: Sgr 1935+2154mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider a scenario in which temporal broadening arises close to the source in Appendix A. SGR 1935+2154 was first associated with the SNR G57.2 +0.8 by Gaensler (2014). This association is supported by the recent work of Kothes et al (2018), who find that the geometric center of SNR G57.2+0.8 (l=57°. 24, b=0°.81) is very close to SGR 1935+2154 (l=57°.25, b=0°.82).…”
Section: A Two-screen Model For the Spectral Properties Of The Two-comentioning
confidence: 74%
“…However, a thermal origin is preferred for normal short bursts from magnetars 26,27 . We notice that ∼ 6% of the bursts (7/109) from SGR J1935+2154 detected with Fermi/GBM between 2014 and 2016 can be best fit with a power-law model 13 19 , then the observed fluence should be ∼ 4 × 10 −15 erg cm −2 in 1-250 keV, which is far below the sensitivity limits of the X-ray telescopes currently in orbit (or in the foreseeable future). This may explain the non-detection of the X-ray counterpart of any cosmological FRB so far.…”
Section: Insight-hxmt Detected a Series Of 11 Bursts Within About 17 mentioning
confidence: 79%