A Psychometric Review of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 (PID–5): Current Status and Future Directions

Al‐Dajani, Nadia; Gralnick, Tara M.; Bagby, R. Michael

doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1107572

Cited by 275 publications

(263 citation statements)

References 115 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

237

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Regarding reliability, despite the few items that each scale contained, the internal consistency coefficients were adequate and values were similar to those that were obtained using the long PID-5 form (Al-Dajani et al, 2016). The values obtained in the Argentinian sample (α = .86-.90) were even higher than those reported in the three previous studies using the PID-5-BF, including those with adult samples (Anderson et al, 2016;Bach et al, 2016;Fossati et al, 2015).…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 45%

Pathological Personality Traits (DSM-5), Risk Factors, and Mental Health

Góngora

Solano

2017

SAGE Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In Section III of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013), a dimensional model of maladaptive personality traits is proposed. This model coexists with, and is an alternative to, the traditional categorical taxonomy and defines a personality trait as a tendency to feel, perceive, behave, and think in relatively consistent ways across time and across situations. Although consistent, traits may also change throughout one's life (APA, 2013).The DSM-5's new model consists of 25 lower order personality facets that are classified into five higher order domains: Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Antagonism, Disinhibition, and Psychoticism. These five broad domains are maladaptive variants of the five domains of the extensively validated and replicated Five-Factor personality model known as the "Big Five": Emotional Stability, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Lucidity (or Openness; Krueger, Derringer, Markon, Watson, & Skodol, 2012). Although the DSM-5 focuses on personality traits that are associated with psychopathology, which is the traditional interest of the DSM classification system, it also recognizes the existence of healthy polar opposites, that is, adaptive and resilient personality traits, which are usually assessed by "normal" personality inventories (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).The Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) was developed to assess the maladaptive personality traits proposed in the DSM-5 (Krueger et al., 2012). There is an increasing body of research that supports the psychometric properties of the PID-5, with an internal consistency α >.70 for all of its dimensions. Evidence of the five-factorial structure has been found in student, community, and clinical samples (see Al-Dajani, Gralnick, and Bagby, 2016, for a review).

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 45%

Pathological Personality Traits (DSM-5), Risk Factors, and Mental Health

Góngora

Solano

2017

SAGE Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As facetas Suspeição e Irresponsabilidade revelaram consistências internas tendencialmente baixas. Este resultado foi também encontrado noutros estudos (Al-Dajani et al, 2016;De Clercq et al, 2014;Roskan et al, 2015), o que indica que serão possivelmente medidas menos fiáveis do que as restantes escalas do instrumento.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…A investigação realizada nos vários países tem mostrado consistentemente as adequadas propriedades métricas do instrumento e a sua convergência empírica e conceptual com outras medidas da personalidade normal e patológica (Al-Dajani, Gralnick, & Bagby, 2016;.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Estudo das Propriedades Psicométricas - Formas Longa, Reduzida e Breve - da Versão Portuguesa do Inventário da Personalidade para o DSM-5 (PID-5)

Pires¹,

Ferreira²,

Guedes³

et al. 2018

REV IBEROAM DIAGN EV

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumoO Inventário da Personalidade para o DSM-5 (PID-5) é um instrumento de autorrelato que mede a presença e severidade dos traços patológicos descritos no modelo de personalidade do DSM-5, parte integrante da classificação das perturbações da personalidade proposta na secção III do DSM-5. Existe numa versão longa de 220 itens organizados em 25 facetas que caracterizam cinco domínios da personalidade, numa versão breve de 25 itens que caracterizam os cinco domínios da personalidade e numa versão reduzida de 100 itens que se revelaram medidas adequadas das 25 facetas e dos cinco domínios do modelo. A precisão e validade das três formas do PID-5 foram analisadas em amostras de estudantes universitários portugueses. Os resultados mostram que as três formas do PID-5 são medidas precisas e válidas das dimensões de personalidade descritas no modelo alternativo da personalidade do DSM-5, ainda que a forma longa de 220 itens seja a mais robusta.Palavras-chave: modelo de traços do DSM-5, PID-5 forma longa, PID-5 forma breve, PID-5 forma reduzida, propriedades psicométricas da adaptação portuguesa do PID-5 AbstractThe DSM-5 proposes a model of conceptualizing personality disorders in which they are characterized by impairments in personality functioning and maladaptive personality traits. The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) is a self-report measure that assesses the presence and severity of the maladaptive personality traits. There is a long form of the PID-5 which is composed of 220 items, organized in 25 facets nested within five trait domains, a brief form with 25 items that assess the five trait domains and a reduced set of 100 PID-5 items that have proven to efficiently measure the 25 traits and five domains. The reliability and validity of the three forms of the PID-5 were analysed in samples of Portuguese universitary students. Results provided evidence that all forms can be used to reliably and validly assess the maladaptive personality traits described in the DSM-5 model, although the long form is the most robust measure.Keywords: the DSM-5 alternative model of personality traits, PID-5 long form, PID-5 brief form, PID-5 reduced set of items, psychometric properties of the Portuguese versions of the PID-5

show abstract

“…Additionally, instruments measuring functional impairment (Level of Personality Functioning Scale [PFS]; Bender et al, 2011) as well as trait facets (Personality Inventory for DSM-5 [PID-5]; Krueger, Derringer, Markon, Watson, & Skodol, 2012) have been empirically developed. For instance, in a recent review of the literature, Al-Dajani, Grainick, and Bagby (2016) reported that there are now 29 empirical studies on the PID-5’s psychometric properties; however, only eight of these studies were conducted using clinical samples. Further, Al-Dajani and colleagues note that only one paper (based on six case studies) described the clinical application of the PID-5 (Bach, Markon, Simonsen, & Krueger, 2015), raising unresolved questions about its clinical utility.…”

Section: The Alternative Model Of Personality Disorder According To Dmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Challenge of Transforming the Diagnostic System of Personality Disorders

Herpertz

Huprich

Bohus

et al. 2017

Journal of Personality Disorders

136

100

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorder (PD) diagnosis allows the field to systematically compare categorical and dimensional classifications, the ICD-11 proposal suggests a radical change by restricting the classification of PDs to one category, deleting all specific types, basing clinical service provision exclusively upon a severity dimension, and restricting trait domains to secondary qualifiers without defining cutoff points. This article reflects broad international agreement about the state of PD diagnosis. It is argued that diagnosis according to the ICD-11 proposal is based on broad, potentially stigmatizing descriptions of impaired functioning and ignores much of the impressive body of research and treatment guidelines that have advanced the care of adults and adolescents with borderline and other PDs. Before radically changing classification, which highly impacts the provision of health care, head-to-head field trials coupled with the views of patients as well as thorough debate among scientists are urgently needed.

show abstract

A Psychometric Review of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 (PID–5): Current Status and Future Directions

Cited by 275 publications

References 115 publications

Pathological Personality Traits (DSM-5), Risk Factors, and Mental Health

Pathological Personality Traits (DSM-5), Risk Factors, and Mental Health

Estudo das Propriedades Psicométricas - Formas Longa, Reduzida e Breve - da Versão Portuguesa do Inventário da Personalidade para o DSM-5 (PID-5)

The Challenge of Transforming the Diagnostic System of Personality Disorders

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About