2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective study on the morbidity resulting from calvarial bone harvesting for intraoral reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the different reconstructive techniques intended to allow a proper, prosthetically driven implant placement in deficient edentulous ridges, autogenous bone grafts taken from the calvarium represent a well‐documented procedure, in terms of both number of patients treated and follow‐up duration (Carinci et al., ; Chiapasco et al., , , , ; Donovan et al., ; Gleizal & Beziat, ; Gutta & Waite, ; Iizuka et al., ; Mertens et al., , ; Putters, Schortinghuis, Vissink, & Raghoebar, ; Quiles et al., ; Restoy‐Lozano et al., ; Sahoo, Roy, Desai, & Gupta, ; Smolka et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the different reconstructive techniques intended to allow a proper, prosthetically driven implant placement in deficient edentulous ridges, autogenous bone grafts taken from the calvarium represent a well‐documented procedure, in terms of both number of patients treated and follow‐up duration (Carinci et al., ; Chiapasco et al., , , , ; Donovan et al., ; Gleizal & Beziat, ; Gutta & Waite, ; Iizuka et al., ; Mertens et al., , ; Putters, Schortinghuis, Vissink, & Raghoebar, ; Quiles et al., ; Restoy‐Lozano et al., ; Sahoo, Roy, Desai, & Gupta, ; Smolka et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as peri-implant bone resorption after the start of prosthetic loading is concerned, results from this study demonstrated very good results over time with a mean peri-implant bone resorption of 1.11 mm (frequency distribution range 0.00-4. (Mertens et al, 2013(Mertens et al, , 2017Quiles et al, 2015;Restoy-Lozano et al, 2015), but also with those reported for implants placed in native bone (De Medeiros et al, 2016;Jung et al, 2012;Niu, Wang, Zhu, Liu, & Ji, 2017;Pjetursson et al, 2012;Van Velzen et al, 2015). See Table 7 for more details.…”
Section: Complications After Implant Placementmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…4,5,6,11,19 The complications of this donor bed are considered low, epidural hematoma formation may occur (when the middle meningeal artery ruptures), exposure or laceration of the dura mater, and, more rarely, neurological complications. 4,5,6,7,8,11,12,14,16,17,18,19 Much has been discussed regarding the acceptance (by professionals and patients) of this technique as a "gold standard" for maxillary reconstructions pre dental implants placement. In fact, because it is a procedure that requires a more complex surgical protocol, which requires an experienced and specialized team, and with risk of trans operative complications, it can generate some insecurity on the part of some professionals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger the defect, the greater the convexity of the skull which increases the risk of perforation of the inner table and dural tear [ 2 ]. Dividing the defect into smaller sections before removal reduces the risk of perforation [ 3 ]. Other risks include cerebral spinal fluid leak and meningitis after dural tear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%