A Prospective Multicenter Study of 163 Sleeve Gastrectomies: Results at 1 and 2 Years

Nocca, David; Krawczykowsky, D.; Bomans, B.; Noe͏̈l, Patrick; Picot, Marie‐Christine; Blanc, Pierre; Hons, Charles de Seguin de; Millat, Bertrand; Gautier, Michel; Monnier, L.; Fabré, J

doi:10.1007/s11695-007-9288-7

Cited by 286 publications

(167 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

137

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The overall complication rate in this review varied from 1.7-11.80% 12,19,22 for LSG and 0.2-24% for LAGB. 12,17,19,20,22,24,25 The highest reported complication rate following LASGB was due to slippage of the adjustable band while the highest rate following LSG was secondary to esophageal reflux symptoms.…”

Section: Blood Loss Complications Conversion To Open Surgery and Rementioning

confidence: 86%

“…13,21 Five of the articles reviewed reported on mortalities in their studies. The overall mortality rate following LSG was 0-0.8% 12,19,20,22 while that of LASGB was 0%.…”

Section: Operative Time Hospital Stay and Mortalitymentioning

confidence: 94%

“…18 Nocca et al studied 163 patients (68% women) with an average age of 41.57 years who underwent LSG. 19 Turker et al studied LSG patients with a mean age of 42 ( 13-79) years and Weiner R et al studied 984 LASGB patients with a mean age of 37.9 (18-65) years. 12,17 Other studies in the LASGB and LSG group had patients with similar age group.…”

Section: Patient Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Laparoscopic Adjustable Silicon Gastric Banding versus Sleeve Gastrectomy

Akpo¹

2009

WJOLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and purpose: Obesity now forms one of the leading public health concerns globally. Several surgical options including sleeve gastrectomy exist for its treatment. Recently, laparoscopic gastric banding has been developed with the aim of providing a laparoscopically placed device that is safe and effective in generating substantial weight loss. The goal of this review is to compare the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic adjustable silicon gastric banding (LASGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in the treatment of morbid obesity by reviewing the methods of patient selection, operative time, conversion rate, complications, blood loss, postoperative morbidity and mortality, hospital stay, and quality of life. Material and methods:A systematic literature search was performed using Highwire press, Springer link, Medline, Medscape and Google, and article bibliographies to identify relevant evidence. Included studies must have reported outcome data for more than 40 patients aged 20 years and above with a minimum of one 1-year follow-up. The operating time, complications, blood loss, hospital stay, morbidity and mortality, and quality of life were reviewed. Results:The total number of patients enrolled was 4,519; the specific procedure totals were 3,714 for LAGB and 805 for LSG. The age range of the population studied was 13-79 years for LSG and 18-65 years for LAGB. The sex distribution had a male:female ratio of 1:4 for LAGB and 1:3 for LSG. The overall complication rate in this review varied from 1.7-11. 80% for LSG and 0.2-24% for LAGB. Conclusion:Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy though, forms a safe surgical option for weight loss treatment particularly in the veryvery-obese patients (BMI > 60 kg/m 2 ). LASGB gives satisfactory results and coupled with reversibility and low cost, it is an important tool in the long-term management of patients with morbid obesity.

show abstract

Section: Blood Loss Complications Conversion To Open Surgery and Rementioning

confidence: 86%

“…13,21 Five of the articles reviewed reported on mortalities in their studies. The overall mortality rate following LSG was 0-0.8% 12,19,20,22 while that of LASGB was 0%.…”

Section: Operative Time Hospital Stay and Mortalitymentioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Patient Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Laparoscopic Adjustable Silicon Gastric Banding versus Sleeve Gastrectomy

Akpo¹

2009

WJOLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Postoperative complications of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy are relatively rare and vary from 0 % to 29 % (mean 11 %) with 0.3 % mortality (1,7,8,9). Perioperative minor complications have an overall incidence of 11 % and major surgical complications 5% in large series (10).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The incidence of leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has been reported to be 0 to 8% for primary surgery (8,11,12,13) and 16-24 % in reintervention procedures (12). Most of these leaks are located near the gastroesophageal junction, in the proximal third of the stomach (14).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE)

Guňková¹,

Guňka²,

Zonča³

et al. 2015

BLL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE: An experience with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using the natural orifi ce specimen extraction (NOSE) technique. BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is nowadays the only long term effective obesity treatment method. METHODS: Twenty one consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with the use of natural orifi ce specimen extraction (NOSE) in the Surgical Clinic of Faculty Hospital Ostrava between May 2012 and August 2012. Inclusion criteria were the body mass index (BMI) higher than 35 kg/m 2 or higher than 32 kg/m 2 accompanied with relevant comorbidities. RESULTS: Among 21 patients in this series, there were three men (14.3 %) and 18 women (85.7 %). Their mean age was 40.9 ± 10.2 years. Their mean preoperative BMI was 40.4 ± 4.6 kg/m 2 . No patient had previous bariatric surgery, one patient had laparoscopic fundoplication. All operations were completed laparoscopically with no conversions to an open procedure. In two cases, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed and the gallbladder was extracted along with the gastric specimen by transgastric approach. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a safe and effective bariatric procedure with low morbidity and mortality. Based on our initial experiences it could be an indication for NOSE with transgastric approach. Obese patients would benefi t from this approach due to the elimination of wound complications (Tab. 2, Fig. 3, Ref. 22). Text in PDF www.elis.sk. KEY WORDS: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy-morbid obesity-bariatric surgery-natural orifi ce specimen extraction

show abstract

Bariatric Surgery: A Primer for the Obstetric Care Provider

Hall

Needleman

2011

Pregnancy in the Obese Woman

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Prospective Multicenter Study of 163 Sleeve Gastrectomies: Results at 1 and 2 Years

Cited by 286 publications

References 18 publications

Laparoscopic Adjustable Silicon Gastric Banding versus Sleeve Gastrectomy

Laparoscopic Adjustable Silicon Gastric Banding versus Sleeve Gastrectomy

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE)

Bariatric Surgery: A Primer for the Obstetric Care Provider

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About