2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prospective Comparative Study of the Feasibility and Reliability of Telephone Follow-Up in Female Urology: The Patient Home Office Novel Evaluation (PHONE) Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study reported the data of more than 600 phone counselling for urological benign pathology: notwithstanding the simple call may seem an obsolete approach for telemedicine and may even seem inadequate for clinical visits, it perfectly matches the recommendations of the European Association of Urology [8]. In fact, the phone call, performed by using hospital phones, can be considered the rst and easiest approach for telemedicine, as reported in previously published experiences, for the management of prostate cancer [11], hematuria [12], stones [13,14], urinary incontinence [15,16] and urinary tract infections [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Our study reported the data of more than 600 phone counselling for urological benign pathology: notwithstanding the simple call may seem an obsolete approach for telemedicine and may even seem inadequate for clinical visits, it perfectly matches the recommendations of the European Association of Urology [8]. In fact, the phone call, performed by using hospital phones, can be considered the rst and easiest approach for telemedicine, as reported in previously published experiences, for the management of prostate cancer [11], hematuria [12], stones [13,14], urinary incontinence [15,16] and urinary tract infections [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Despite no clear guidelines on the use of telemedicine in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery, recently an effort was made to provide guidance regarding management of common outpatient urogynecology scenarios during the pandemic (7). While surgeons usually feel compelled to check postoperative patients, there is growing evidence that patient stratification based on perioperative risk and postoperative risk may decrease the total number of conventional visits to enhance physical distancing (6). Recently, a pre-COVID-19 pandemic randomized clinical trial showed that telephone interview after pelvic floor surgery resulted in non-inferior patient satisfaction, without differences in clinical outcomes or adverse events (8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interview visits were rescheduled, and in the meanwhile a telephone interview was performed. Telephone interviews were conducted through a modified version of the questionnaire validated by Balzarro et al (6), investigating prolapse symptoms, urinary incontinence, sexual dysfunction, voiding difficulties, lower urinary tract symptoms and bowel dysfunction (Table 1). Patients were also asked if they had other symptoms or disorders, to identify patients who may need urgent hospital evaluation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The primary outcome, VT failure, was not significantly different (53% PVR VT vs. 53% PVR-free VT, p = 1.0). There were no significant differences in days of postoperative catheterization (1 [0, 4] in PVR VT vs. 1 [0,4] in PVR-free VT, p = 0.90), UTI (20% PVR VT vs. 20% PVR-free VT, p = 1.0), or postoperative voiding dysfunction (4% PVR VT vs. 5% PVR-free VT, p = 1.0). The authors concluded that it is not necessary to check a postvoid residual following reconstructive pelvic surgery, and a patient can safely go home without catheterization as long as she is able to void 50% of the retrograde filled bladder volume [112].…”
Section: Voiding Dysfunction and Retentionmentioning
confidence: 99%