1984
DOI: 10.1109/mm.1984.291224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Proposed Radix- and Word-length-independent Standard for Floating-point Arithmetic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another example is a fluid simulation that is coupled with a solids structure code, as is done in some industrial process modeling [8]. We also examine performance for large arrays of IEEE 754 standard doubles [15] (64-bit floats) which routinely occur in scientific computing and typically dominate the total number of bytes sent between procedures and functions. We varied the size of the double arrays from 10 to 1,000,000.…”
Section: Schema-specific Parsersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example is a fluid simulation that is coupled with a solids structure code, as is done in some industrial process modeling [8]. We also examine performance for large arrays of IEEE 754 standard doubles [15] (64-bit floats) which routinely occur in scientific computing and typically dominate the total number of bytes sent between procedures and functions. We varied the size of the double arrays from 10 to 1,000,000.…”
Section: Schema-specific Parsersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We considered some alternatives, such as adding IEEE floating point not-a-number (NAN) style values [7] would solve the iteration problem, but would introduce a larger problem because the number of bits required to represent bi-valued enumerations like bit and boolean would double. While not a problem for scalars, this would certainly be problematic for arrays, especially when used to represent numeric data types like ubyte and int.…”
Section: Iterationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exponent reduction by means of the factors described above reduces the absolute value of the decimal exponent by 9, 13, or 14 per step, so the last step (to reduce the remaining decimal exponent to zero) may have to use a different factor, chosen from a small table of residual factors of the same general form. For example, to reduce a residual decimal exponent of ϩ5, use the factor 5 5 Note that, because of the choice of decimal arithmetic for reducing negative exponents, all calculations described above are exact if we allow the bignum fraction to grow by up to one bigdigit per multiplication. The maximum number of multiplications is determined by the valid exponent range, and is therefore bounded by the format of the binary floating-point number (whether input or output).…”
Section: Conversion Between Decimal and Binary Floating-pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work was conducted through the IEEE Floating-Point Working Group P754. IBM's first "straw-man" architecture proposal for implementing the IEEE Floating-Point draft standard [1][2][3][4][5] in the then-current S/370* architecture dates from 1982. In 1985, ANSI/IEEE Standard 754-1985 [6] was approved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%