2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.07.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A profit-centric strategy for distributed generation planning considering time varying voltage dependent load demand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expansion planning of DG based on dynamic fuzzy interactive approach with network reinforcement was well explained in [12], which optimized total cost, emission cost and voltage profile of the network by determining the best possible design of http://dx.doi.org/10.12785/ijcds/080609 http://journals.uob.edu.bh timing, rating and placement of DG. Investigation of DNO profit and selection of optimal DG size options for various loading conditions were proposed in [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expansion planning of DG based on dynamic fuzzy interactive approach with network reinforcement was well explained in [12], which optimized total cost, emission cost and voltage profile of the network by determining the best possible design of http://dx.doi.org/10.12785/ijcds/080609 http://journals.uob.edu.bh timing, rating and placement of DG. Investigation of DNO profit and selection of optimal DG size options for various loading conditions were proposed in [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the previous studies have considered the power utility as the DG owner. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]19,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] Nowadays, since the interest of the private investors to participate in DG investment is increasing, more DGEP research should be conducted at the viewpoint of these investors, with more details and accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodologies proposed in the literature can be stratified by objective function, algorithm applied and additional control variables utilized. In relation to algorithms, the most common applied are: Exhaustive Search [3], Genetic [4][5][6][7][8][9][10], Particle Swarm Optimization [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], Mixed-Integer Linear Programming [27,28], Artificial Neural Networks [29], Kalman Filter [30], Evolutionary [31], Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II [32], Tabu Search [33], Multi-Objective Nonlinear Programming [34], Chaotic Artificial Bee Colony [35] and Fuzzy Approach [36]. There are also new algorithms proposed by the authors: Chaotic Local Search and Modified Honey Bee Mating Optimization [37], Modified Discrete Particle Swarm Optimization [38], Modified Teaching-Learning Based Optimization [39], Plant Growth Simulation [40], Imperialist Competitive Algorithm [41] and Improved Multi-Objective Harmony Search [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%