1993
DOI: 10.1002/1098-108x(199304)13:3<297::aid-eat2260130308>3.0.co;2-t
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

A problematic counter-regulation experiment: Implications for the link between dietary restraint and overeating

Abstract: The current study failed to find any evidence of laboratory counter‐regulation amongst restrained eaters given a preload, regardless of the measures of dietary restraint used to classify subjects, including dieting status on the day of the study. Furthermore, there was no evidence to suggest that high restrainers characteristically overeat or experience a sense of loss of control over eating in naturalistic settings. These findings indicate that the link between dietary restraint and overeating or bulimic epis… Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
29
3
2
0

Citation Types

2
7
0
0

Year Published

Range
1996
1996
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
28
4
2

Relationship

0
34

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 34 publications

(9 citation statements)
references

References 29 publications

2
7
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…It was unrelated to eating behaviors in the present study. This is consistent with previous findings that self-reported cognitive restraint often does not predict either objective eating behavior (Stice et al, 2007(Stice et al, , 2010 or disinhibited eating (Dritschel, Cooper, & Charnock, 1993;Lowe & Kleifield, 1988;Morgan & Jeffrey, 1999;Ouwens et al, 2003;Van Strien et al, 2000). It is not surprising that this subscale did not predict eating in this study.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%