Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2004.1315198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A probabilistic framework for combining tracking algorithms

Abstract: For the past few years researches have been investigating enhancing tracking performance by combining several different tracking algorithms. We propose an analytically justified, probabilistic framework to combine multiple tracking algorithms. The separate tracking algorithms considered output a probability distribution function of the tracked state, sequentially for each image. The algorithms may output either an explicit probability distribution function, or a sample-set of it via CONDENSATION. The proposed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the proposed local-motion model can help resolve ambiguities associated with multiple visually similar targets, it can be used in existing probabilistic multi-cue integration frameworks like [32,8,16], or as extension to multipletarget tracking schemes, such as [31], to increase their robustness when tracking visually-similar targets. Note also that the local-motion-based feature is general enough to be used not only within the framework of particle filters, but also with non-stochastic methods: For example, the discrimination-based trackers such as the recently proposed AdaBoost tracker [33] or the level-set-based blob trackers like [34,35].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the proposed local-motion model can help resolve ambiguities associated with multiple visually similar targets, it can be used in existing probabilistic multi-cue integration frameworks like [32,8,16], or as extension to multipletarget tracking schemes, such as [31], to increase their robustness when tracking visually-similar targets. Note also that the local-motion-based feature is general enough to be used not only within the framework of particle filters, but also with non-stochastic methods: For example, the discrimination-based trackers such as the recently proposed AdaBoost tracker [33] or the level-set-based blob trackers like [34,35].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using mathematical induction, we show that it is possible to sequentially generate particles and weights according to (13) and (14) respectively to represent the cumulative posterior distribution (12).…”
Section: Low Latency Distributed Initialization Of a Target's Stamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output of our initialization algorithm can be used to initialize various distributed joint tracking (DJT) algorithms such as those described in [11], [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining the two modalities would seem to be a rational approach to obtaining optimum system performance and robustness. In relation to object tracking in particular, it is generally recognised that tracking robustness cannot be obtained with one modality (or feature) alone, and that increased robustness can be obtained by combining multiple modalities (also known as multi-cue tracking) in such a way that they can, together, compensate for their individual weaknesses [26,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%