2013
DOI: 10.1093/imanum/drt001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A priori error analysis for finite element approximations of the Stokes problem on dynamic meshes

Abstract: In this article we study finite element approximations of the time-dependent Stokes system on dynamically changing meshes. Applying the backward Euler method for time discretization we use the discrete Helmholtz or Stokes projection to evaluate the solution at time t n−1 on the new spatial mesh at time t n . The theoretical results consist of a priori error estimates that show a dependence on the time step size not better than O(1/Δt). These surprisingly pessimistic upper bounds are complemented by numerical e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our case, this operator is the Lagrange interpolation operator which was also proposed in [40]. However, it is known that dynamically changing meshes may lead to spurious oscillations of the pressure for small time step sizes [16,18]. Indeed, we will observe those oscillations in our numerical results, as shown in Section 6.5.2.…”
Section: The Dirichlet-neumann Methodsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our case, this operator is the Lagrange interpolation operator which was also proposed in [40]. However, it is known that dynamically changing meshes may lead to spurious oscillations of the pressure for small time step sizes [16,18]. Indeed, we will observe those oscillations in our numerical results, as shown in Section 6.5.2.…”
Section: The Dirichlet-neumann Methodsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…14 (a) occur whenever the ALE mapping is reparametrized. These jumps are to be expected for dynamically changing meshes, as pointed out in [16,18]. Next, we quantify the unbalance in the power exchange at the interface.…”
Section: Power Exchange At the Interfacementioning
confidence: 77%
“…The error estimates are presented first for static space meshes. For time-varying meshes, there is an additional projection error due to mesh changes, for which we derive a novel sharp estimate compared to existing results [43,4,20,10]. Our second main result are estimates on the error derivatives; we focus on static space meshes for simplicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The error introduced by this transfer operator will be accounted for by the error estimators anyway. However, due to the high sensitivity of the pressure approximation to mesh modification, see for instance [9,12,13], in order to avoid severe pressure oscillations, it is highly recommended to project the approximations on a given time level to the discretely divergence free space of the next time. To this end we introduce the following projection.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changing the mesh (usually) results in a change of the discrete constraint, which in turn may have a devastating effect at least on the Lagrangian multiplier (i.e. the pressure for incompressible fluids), if the transfer of the primal variable from one step to the next one is realized by just standard operators (interpolation or L 2 projection), see [9,12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%