2020
DOI: 10.1017/s0950268820002423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A predictive model for Covid-19 spread – with application to eight US states and how to end the pandemic

Abstract: A compartmental model is proposed to predict the coronavirus 2019 (Covid-19) spread. It considers: detected and undetected infected populations, social sequestration, release from sequestration, plus reinfection. This model, consisting of seven coupled equations, has eight coefficients which are evaluated by fitting data for eight US states that make up 43% of the US population. The evolution of Covid-19 is fairly similar among the states: variations in contact and undetected recovery rates remain below 5%; ho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second advantage of our approach is that it directly measures and informs policy-relevant variables. For example, the White House issued guidance on reopening the US economy that depends on a decrease in the documented number of cases and in the proportion of positive test results over a 14-day period, among other criteria and considerations [23,[78][79][80][81][82][83]. As noted above, the number and proportion of positive test results are the outcomes of a data generating process that includes not only the underlying contagion process but a multitude of mediating factors as well as idiosyncrasies of the data collection and a delayed reporting process.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second advantage of our approach is that it directly measures and informs policy-relevant variables. For example, the White House issued guidance on reopening the US economy that depends on a decrease in the documented number of cases and in the proportion of positive test results over a 14-day period, among other criteria and considerations [23,[78][79][80][81][82][83]. As noted above, the number and proportion of positive test results are the outcomes of a data generating process that includes not only the underlying contagion process but a multitude of mediating factors as well as idiosyncrasies of the data collection and a delayed reporting process.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study aims to take advantage of available worldwide data on COVID-19 (Roser et al, 2021;Dong et al, 2020) to benchmark and assign error bars to minimal models, like the susceptibleinfected-recovered (SIR) with different sophistication levels (Kermack and McKendrick, 1927;Weiss, 2013;He et al, 2020a;Yang and Wang, 2020;Khan et al, 2020;Annas et al, 2020), a straightforward least-squares best-fit (LS) Statistical Heuristic Regression based on a lognormal distribution (Lam, 1988), or basic Monte-Carlo simulation (Girona, 2020;Gang, 2020). It is wellknown that finding a global minimum of non-linear least-squares problems for p free parameters requires, at worst, a brute force search in p-dimensional parameter space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the models consider the classification of a given population in some parts: Susceptible (S), Infective (I), Recovered (R), among others, and are then dubbed in terms of which of them they consider for the dynamics of the disease: SIR, SEIR, etcetera. There is historical evidence that such models are in good agreement with the dynamics of past epidemics [1], and such past successes have triggered its use in the present crisis, see for instance, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%