2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.09.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A predator–prey model for moon-triggered clumping in Saturn’s rings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regime (b) is especially relevant to conditions in the F ring of Saturn, where the r p parameter is close to 0.83. Our simulations, like Salo (1995) and Karjalainen & Salo (2004), are hence consistent with observations of embedded large bodies in the F ring, and theories that attribute their prevalence to a size distribution dynamics comprising gravitational aggregation, and tidal and collisional disruption (Barbara & Esposito 2002; Esposito et al 2012). Our simulations directly animate these processes from first principles, though the real system exhibits many more physical effects than our model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regime (b) is especially relevant to conditions in the F ring of Saturn, where the r p parameter is close to 0.83. Our simulations, like Salo (1995) and Karjalainen & Salo (2004), are hence consistent with observations of embedded large bodies in the F ring, and theories that attribute their prevalence to a size distribution dynamics comprising gravitational aggregation, and tidal and collisional disruption (Barbara & Esposito 2002; Esposito et al 2012). Our simulations directly animate these processes from first principles, though the real system exhibits many more physical effects than our model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The F ring is thought to comprise a population of large objects (of some 10 km) swathed in dust (Showalter 2004; Esposito et al 2008; Murray et al 2008). Being located so near the Roche limit, the size distribution of these larger bodies evolves according to gravitational aggregation, and tidal and collisional disruption (Barbara & Esposito 2002; Esposito et al 2012). The tidal environment is very different for those dense narrow rings located interior the Roche limit, such as the ε ring of Uranus or the dense ringlets ensconced in Saturn’s C ring (Colwell et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent encounters would be equally likely to perturb an object back towards the ring, depending on its exact orbit and the phase of closest approach, meaning objects could undergo a chaotic random walk in ∆a around the core. Likewise their solidity and size would evolve by collisions in a random way over time with only a lucky few aggregating into solid moonlets as described in Esposito et al (2012). We conclude this to be the likely formation mechanism for S6 which must be a relatively young object.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This is further evidence for ongoing accretion in the F ring core as investigated by Canup and Esposito (1995) and Karjalainen (2007) among others. There is already evidence that Prometheus may aid in triggering clump formation (Beurle et al, 2010;Esposito et al, 2012) and perturbing objects onto their colliding orbits. Although collisional features are not correlated with Prometheus's location this does not rule out its influence as objects perturbed onto differing orbits would naturally spread around the ring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed it is true that N -body simulations show F-ring particles readily clump into gravitationally bound aggregates, akin to 'rubble piles' (Karjalainen and Salo, 2004;Latter et al, 2012b), whose further growth and collisional destruction characterise the general dynamics (Karjalainen, 2007;Hyodo and Ohtsuki, 2014). The collective outcome of aggregation and disruption has been theoretically explored using statistical methods similar to those employed in other astrophysical disks (Barbara and Esposito, 2002;Esposito et al, 2012). There remains, however, plenty of scope to further ap-ply the well developed techniques of debris disks and planet formation to this problem.…”
Section: Ringsmentioning
confidence: 99%