A practical evaluation of the performance of Al2O3-water, TiO2-water and CuO-water nanofluids for convective cooling

Abstract

The convective heat transfer, pressure drop and required pumping power for the turbulent flow of Al2O3water, TiO2-water and CuO-water nanofluids in a heated, horizontal tube with a constant heat flux are investigated experimentally. Results show that presenting nanofluid performance by the popular approach of plotting Nusselt number versus Reynolds number is misleading and can create the impression that nanofluids enhance heat transfer efficiency. This approach is shown to be problematic since both Nusselt number and Reynolds number are functions of nanofluid concentration. When results are presented in terms of actual heat transfer coefficient or tube temperature versus flow rate or pressure drop, adding nanoparticles to the water is shown to degrade heat transfer for all the nanofluids and under all conditions considered. Replacing water with nanofluid at the same flow rate reduces the convective heat transfer rate by reducing the operating Reynolds number of the system. Achieving a target temperature under a given heat load is shown to require significantly higher flow rates and pumping power when using nanofluids compared to water, and hence none of the nanofluids are found to offer any practical benefits. Declarations of interest: noneNomenclature A Inside surface area of the test section tube (m 2 ) Cp Specific heat (J/kg.K) Pr Prandtl number V Average fluid velocity (m/s) Greek letters  Volume fraction of nanofluids Ratio between the nanolayer thickness surrounding the nanoparticle and the nanoparticle radius Kinematic viscosity (m 2 /s) Density (kg/m 3 ) µ Dynamic viscosity (Pa s)

Heat Transfer Characteristics of Conventional Fluids and Nanofluids in Micro-Channels with Vortex Generators: A Review

“…However, using a fixed Reynolds number showed good enhancement of heat transfer. The same findings were concluded by Alkasmoul [220,221].…”

CFD analysis of a nanofluid-based microchannel heat sink

“…In those studies, the Reynolds number was assumed to be the independent variable and the others, such as the Nusselt's number, heat transfer coefficient, pressure drop, and friction factor, are dependents. However, since the thermophysical properties of nanofluids differ than those of water depending on the concentration of the suspended nanoparticles, analyzing the performance of a microchannel basing only on the Reynolds number is misleading [24], [27]. Therefore, another factor must be taken in consideration.…”

Management of conjugate heat transfer using various arrangements of cylindrical vortex generators in micro-channels

“…Effective thermal management in electronic micro-chips is crucial since the excessive heat generated can cause damage to the micro-chip components [1]. Inexorable reductions in the size of the components and increases in processor power makes it even more challenging for thermal researchers to produce an effective cooling method and/or a design to remove the generated heat.…”

“…Interestingly, even though the overall enhancement (Performance Evaluation Criteria (PEC) index) is not significant, this has motivated researchers to investigate the possibility of implementing advanced fluids that have high thermal properties in heat transfer systems. For example, the PECs for nanofluids are often poor (with PEC < 1) [1], but they are still attracting researchers to investigate the heat transfer enhancement neglecting the pressure penalty [14].…”