2017
DOI: 10.1137/16m105678x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Polynomial Time Algorithm for Computing Extinction Probabilities of Multitype Branching Processes

Abstract: We show that one can approximate the least fixed point solution for a multivariate system of monotone probabilistic polynomial equations in time polynomial in both the encoding size of the system of equations and in log(1/), where > 0 is the desired additive error bound of the solution. (The model of computation is the standard Turing machine model.) We use this result to resolve several open problems regarding the computational complexity of computing key quantities associated with some classic and well studi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[n] of target non-terminals, and a start non-terminal T i ∈ V , decide whether (i) ∃σ ∈ Ψ : P r σ Ti [ q∈K Reach(T q )] = 1, & (ii) P r * Ti [ q∈K Reach(T q )] = 1. 7 The fact that these statements are equivalent is easy to prove; see the full version. 8 Technically, as given, this OBMDP in not in simple normal form; but this can easily be rectified by using an auxiliary branching non-terminal, Q, adding the rule Q (2.)…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[n] of target non-terminals, and a start non-terminal T i ∈ V , decide whether (i) ∃σ ∈ Ψ : P r σ Ti [ q∈K Reach(T q )] = 1, & (ii) P r * Ti [ q∈K Reach(T q )] = 1. 7 The fact that these statements are equivalent is easy to prove; see the full version. 8 Technically, as given, this OBMDP in not in simple normal form; but this can easily be rectified by using an auxiliary branching non-terminal, Q, adding the rule Q (2.)…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This objective was studied in [10] (and [11]) for OBMDPs and their (concurrent) stochastic game generalizations. 8 This paper considers the multi-objective reachability problem, which is a natural extension of the previously studied (single-target) reachability problem. In the multi-objective setting we have multiple target non-terminals, and we want to optimize each of the respective probabilities of achieving multiple given objectives, each one being a boolean combination of reachability and 7 We can assume, without loss of generality, that the initial derivation consists of a single given root, because for any given collection µ ∈ V * of multiple roots, we can always add an auxiliary non-terminal T f to the set V , where Γ f = {a} and the set R(T f , a) contains a single probabilistic rule, T f 1 − → µ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the multi-objective setting we have multiple target non-terminals, and we want to optimize each of the respective probabilities of achieving multiple given objectives, each one being a boolean combination of reachability and 7 We can assume, without loss of generality, that the initial derivation consists of a single given root, because for any given collection µ ∈ V * of multiple roots, we can always add an auxiliary non-terminal T f to the set V , where Γ f = {a} and the set R(T f , a) contains a single probabilistic rule, T f 1 − → µ. 8 The models analysed in [10] and [11] are game generalizations of Branching Processes, but for the case of a single target computing reachability probabilities in Branching Processes is equivalent to computing reachability probabilities in Ordered Branching Processes (same holds for the MDP and game generalizations of these models).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%