2016
DOI: 10.1080/19345747.2015.1126875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Pilot Study of the Impact of Double-Dose Robust Vocabulary Instruction on Children's Vocabulary Growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Longitudinal twin studies have reported significant genetic effects on late-talker status in toddlers (Zubrick et al, 2007) and vocabulary development between preschool and fourth grade (Byrne et al, 2009;Olson et al, 2011). Additionally, individual differences in word learning have been documented in experimental studies that have carefully controlled the quantity and quality of word exposures (Adlof & Patten, 2017;Gellert & Elbro, 2013;Language and Reading Research Consortium et al, 2016;Warmington et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longitudinal twin studies have reported significant genetic effects on late-talker status in toddlers (Zubrick et al, 2007) and vocabulary development between preschool and fourth grade (Byrne et al, 2009;Olson et al, 2011). Additionally, individual differences in word learning have been documented in experimental studies that have carefully controlled the quantity and quality of word exposures (Adlof & Patten, 2017;Gellert & Elbro, 2013;Language and Reading Research Consortium et al, 2016;Warmington et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McKeown et al further showed that such benefits from high-encounter conditions only exist when the activities were provided via rich vocabulary lessons. Subsequent studies have generally supported these findings on the positive effects of frequency of word encounters in the context of rich vocabulary instruction (Coyne et al, 2007, 2009; Language and Reading Research Consortium et al, 2016).…”
Section: Word Encounters and Moderately Rich Vocabulary Instructionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Finally, the increased number of word encounters in rich vocabulary instruction does not necessarily produce enhanced outcomes in the vocabulary learning of young children. The Language and Reading Research Consortium et al (2016) reported that children who received a double-dose of rich vocabulary instruction did not learn significantly more word meanings than those who received a single-dose of rich vocabulary instruction. Additionally, it is questionable whether students need 12 word encounters to increase their word knowledge and reading comprehension or whether a smaller number of word encounters (more than 4 but less than 12) would be sufficient in the context of rich vocabulary instruction.…”
Section: Word Encounters and Moderately Rich Vocabulary Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%