A pilot study of a text message and online brief contact intervention following self-harm or a suicide attempt: A mixed methods evaluation

Josifovski, Natasha; Shand, Fiona; Morley, Kirsten C.; Chia, Justin; Henshaw, Richard C.; Petrie, Katherine; Reda, Bilal; Li, Emily; Theobald, Adam; Onie, Sandersan; Tye, Michelle; Berrouiguet, Sofian; Batterham, Philip J.; Haber, Paul S.; Christensen, Helen; Larsen, Mark E.

doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2022.03.002

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Table 3 provides an overview of the study characteristics. There were several study types from the 52 published articles including four randomized control trials [17][18][19][20], one meta-analysis of randomised control trials [21], one clinical review [22], four systematic review and meta-analysis [4,7,23,24], nine systematic reviews [3,5,6,[25][26][27][28][29]63], one mixed methods [30], five literature or scoping reviews [31][32][33][34][35], two integrative reviews [36][37], thirteen pilots or trials [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50], seven qualitative studies [51][52][53][54][55][56]…”

Section: Study Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Study type [17][18][19][20] Randomised control trials (RCT) [21] Meta-analysis of randomised control trials [22] Clinical review [4], [7], [23][24] Systematic review and meta-analysis [3], [5][6], [25][26][27][28][29], [63] Systematic review [30] Mixed methods [31][32][33][34] Literature review / scoping review [36][37] Integrative review [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] Pilots / trials Author Demographics [35], [42][43], [47], [53], [58], [59] Young people aged 14-22 years old [62] Youth [54] Young females …”

Section: Authormentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Theme 1: Acceptability by users [5], [18], [40], [45], [47][48], [55][56][57] Suicide prevention and self-injury apps [6], [35] Text messaging services [6], [24], [36] Social media platforms and mobile phones [54] Chat function Theme 2: Future inclusion of experts-by-experience [3] Adolescents and greater acceptance of technologies [5], [26], [30], [65] Lived experience in design of interventions and trials [32], [46], [50] Importance of user engagement or focus groups [29], [34], [37], [39], [51] Codesign, coproduction, collaboration, user centred Theme 3: Inconsistent use of Public, Patient Involvement (PPI) [66] Consulted mental health experts and not service users [25] Final stages of usability testing [58] Middle stage of research as user-informed [41] Collaborate to support the analysis [18], [43], [53], [55], [57], [59], [61] Members of focus groups or advisory groups [19], [44][45][46]…”

Section: Author Themementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Codesign of digital health tools for suicide prevention: A scoping review

Wepa

Neal

Gazala

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The importance of codesigning digital health tools for suicide prevention has gained popularity since 2012. Promoted as cost-effective and innovative, digital health tools are widely used but seldom described or evaluated from a codesign lens. This scoping review provides an overview of the research and gaps in the delivery of codesigned digital health tools for suicide prevention. This review is phase two within a three-phase study. Phase one involved a scoping review protocol which informed this scoping review and the results will contribute to a proof-of-concept project to develop a digital tool for suicide prevention (phase three). The search strategy followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-SCR) and Population, Concept, Context (PCC) framework to ensure reporting standards were maintained and supplemented by Arksey and O’Malley and Levac et al. The search dates occurred from November 2022 to March 2023. Five data bases were searched: Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycInfo and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Grey literature searches included government, non-government health websites, Google and Google Scholar. 3260 records were identified from the initial search and 61 were included in the final review. All members of the research team screened the included records. Data from published and grey literature were extracted and a narrative approach identified the results and five themes (acceptability by users, future inclusion of experts-by-experience, inconsistent use of Patient and Public Involvement (PPI), digital tools to supplement face-to-face therapy and digital divide). We found that none of the data from the included studies used codesign methodology and experts-by-experience roles were minimised as members of focus groups, advisory groups, pilot studies or at the final stage of usability testing. Future research is required where codesign involves co-authorship with experts-by experience, end-to-end partnership from design, implementation and evaluation of digital health tools for suicide prevention.

show abstract

Section: Study Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Authormentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Author Themementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Codesign of digital health tools for suicide prevention: A scoping review

Wepa

Neal

Gazala

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Needs for mobile and internet-based psychological intervention in patients with self-injury and suicide-related behaviors: a qualitative systematic review

Luo,

Yue,

et al. 2024

BMC Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background In recent years, mobile psychological interventions have proven effective in reducing self-injury and suicide-related behaviors. Therefore, it is essential to continually enhance the user experience and address patients' needs to facilitate the development of mobile mental health interventions. Identifying patients with mobile mental health needs can be challenging for mental health professionals. To address this, we conducted a systematic review of qualitative research to synthesize the needs of patients engaged in self-injury and suicide-related behaviors for mobile and internet-based psychological interventions. Methods This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement (PRISMA) and the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research statement (ENTREQ). We explored 11 databases and synthesized the results using thematic analysis. Results Sixteen qualitative and mixed-method studies were included. The study found that the needs of patients with self-injury and suicide-related behaviors for mobile psychological intervention included therapy, technology, culture, privacy, communication, emotional support, personalization, and self-management. Consistent with the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the needs of patients with self-injury and suicide-related behaviors are influenced by the perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of the mobile intervention. However, the findings also highlight the importance and unmet needs of peer support, communication, self-management, and empowerment in using mobile psychological interventions for patients with self-injury and suicide-related behaviors. Conclusions Studies in this area have shown that the needs of patients with self-harm and suicide-related behaviors cover multiple stages, including basic therapeutic and technical needs and advanced emotional needs. This complexity makes it challenging to address the needs of patients engaged in self-injury and suicide-related behaviors through digital interventions. In the future, mental health professionals should be encouraged to participate in multidisciplinary collaborations to expand the use of digital interventions, enhancing remote self-management for patients and providing new strategies for the ongoing care of psychiatric patients. We registered the review protocol on PROSPERO (CRD42022324958).

show abstract

A pilot study of a text message and online brief contact intervention following self-harm or a suicide attempt: A mixed methods evaluation

Cited by 2 publications

References 7 publications

Codesign of digital health tools for suicide prevention: A scoping review

Codesign of digital health tools for suicide prevention: A scoping review

Needs for mobile and internet-based psychological intervention in patients with self-injury and suicide-related behaviors: a qualitative systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About