2008
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.3520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phase I study of MK-0646, a humanized monoclonal antibody against the insulin-like growth factor receptor type 1 (IGF1R) in advanced solid tumor patients in a q2 wk schedule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When it occurred in the present study, it was adequately controlled by oral antihyperglycemic agents and did not interfere with dalotuzumab dosing. Thrombocytopenia has also been reported (as a DLT) in a prior study of dalotuzumab (28) and also in a study of the anti-IGF-1R antibody AMG-479 (16). None was observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…When it occurred in the present study, it was adequately controlled by oral antihyperglycemic agents and did not interfere with dalotuzumab dosing. Thrombocytopenia has also been reported (as a DLT) in a prior study of dalotuzumab (28) and also in a study of the anti-IGF-1R antibody AMG-479 (16). None was observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In the case of the IgG1 antibody MK-0646 (Merck), pre-and post-tumor biopsies were collected and used to show tumor downregulation of key pathway components such as IGF-1R, pAKT, pERK, and pS6 (45). One notable clinical differentiation point among the molecules is that antibodies with the IgG1 backbone have been reported to have potentially greater severity of hematological toxicities than IgG2 antibodies, because dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia have been described for AMG-479 and MK-0646 in several studies (42,45,46). An alternate explanation is that these antibodies may bind to different epitopes, thus contributing to different potency and toxicity.…”
Section: Clinical-translational Advancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En cuanto a la toxicidad, se pudieron analizar en ese momento los datos de 178 pacientes, comunicándose una toxicidad grado 3-4 de hiperglucemia (11% vs 4%), astenia (9% vs 7%) y neutropenia (14% vs 14%) como toxicidades más reseñables 32 . Otros anticuerpos de distintas compañías farmacéuticas que están siendo estudiados actúan contra el IGFR1 con un perfil de tolerancia similar al CP-751871 [33][34][35][36][37] . Se ha detectado en estos estudios clínicos la presencia de un aumento de IGF1 y hormona del crecimiento circulante que era previsible, así como una hiperglicemia 31,38,39 .…”
Section: Bloquear Al Receptor Extracelularmenteunclassified