TO THE EDITOR: We read with keen interest the article by Eseonu et al. 2 (Eseonu CI, Goodwin CR, Zhou X, et al: Reduced CSF leak in complete calvarial reconstructions of microvascular decompression craniectomies using calcium phosphate cement. J Neurosurg 123:1476-1479, December 2015) regarding the reduced incidence of CSF leaks following complete calvarial reconstruction of craniectomies done for microvascular decompression (MVD) using calcium phosphate cement.MVD is a very fruitful surgery and provides symptomatic relief in up to 95% of patients with trigeminal neuralgia.4,5 CSF leakage following MVD can be devastating. We commend the innovative idea of the authors in their efforts to reduce the incidence of CSF leaks following retrosigmoid craniectomy for MVD. The authors report on 221 patients who underwent retrosigmoid craniectomy for MVD to treat trigeminal neuralgia. Of 221 patients, 116 consecutive patients received polyethylene titanium mesh incomplete cranioplasty and the subsequent 105 patients received calcium phosphate for complete cranioplasty. They reported a statistically significant higher incidence of CSF leaks in the incomplete-cranioplasty group and no leaks in the calcium phosphate group. We would like to bring few important points in this article to the kind attention of the readers.Dural closure was augmented with a collagen dural substitute, which was sutured to the dura and reinforced with collagen matrix and fibrin sealant. However, the article did not mention the number of patients in whom dural substitute was required for dural closure (in patients in whom primary dural closure was not possible) in each group, and this could be a cause of bias.3 Other causes of poor wound healing like diabetes, steroid use, and malnutrition were not evaluated and can be a very important cause of bias and need to be accounted for. Moreover, the rate of CSF leak reported in one of the largest series of MVD was 1.5%.1 There might be some other factors responsible for a high CSF leakage rate in the patients who received polyethylene titanium mesh-augmented incomplete cranioplasty (CSF leakage rate 4.5%). Hence, a randomized study to remove the confounding factors would be ideal to determine the superiority of one method of cranioplasty over other.