2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18659-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A petascale automated imaging pipeline for mapping neuronal circuits with high-throughput transmission electron microscopy

Abstract: Electron microscopy (EM) is widely used for studying cellular structure and network connectivity in the brain. We have built a parallel imaging pipeline using transmission electron microscopes that scales this technology, implements 24/7 continuous autonomous imaging, and enables the acquisition of petascale datasets. The suitability of this architecture for large-scale imaging was demonstrated by acquiring a volume of more than 1 mm3 of mouse neocortex, spanning four different visual areas at synaptic resolut… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
168
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
168
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This improvement was in large part due to two noteworthy advances: fast imaging owing to multibeam scanning electron microscopy (Eberle et al 2015) and the profound effect of AI on image processing and analysis (Januszewski et al 2018). The rapid improvements over the past few years (Briggman, Helmstaedter, and Denk 2011;Bock et al 2011;Helmstaedter et al 2013;Takemura et al 2013;Lee et al 2016;Motta et al 2019;Scheffer et al 2020;Dorkenwald et al 2020;Yin et al 2020;Gour et al 2021) argues that analyzing volumes that are even three orders of magnitude larger, such as an exascale whole mouse brain connectome, will likely be in reach within a decade (Abbott et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This improvement was in large part due to two noteworthy advances: fast imaging owing to multibeam scanning electron microscopy (Eberle et al 2015) and the profound effect of AI on image processing and analysis (Januszewski et al 2018). The rapid improvements over the past few years (Briggman, Helmstaedter, and Denk 2011;Bock et al 2011;Helmstaedter et al 2013;Takemura et al 2013;Lee et al 2016;Motta et al 2019;Scheffer et al 2020;Dorkenwald et al 2020;Yin et al 2020;Gour et al 2021) argues that analyzing volumes that are even three orders of magnitude larger, such as an exascale whole mouse brain connectome, will likely be in reach within a decade (Abbott et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with any magnification process, the electron density at the phosphor drops off as the column is extended. To mitigate the impact of reduced electron density on image quality (shot noise), a highsensitivity sCMOS camera was selected and the scintillator composition tuned in order to generate high quality EM images within exposure times of 90 -200 ms 63 .…”
Section: Electron Microscopy Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, upscaling these results to whole mouse brain imaging is challenging; one estimate for diamond-cut blockface scanning electron microscopy is that it would take eight years to image a volume of (1 mm) 3 at 16 nm voxel resolution (Xu et al, 2017), while another estimate is that it would take 12 years for the same volume at 10 Â 10 Â 25 nm resolution (Titze & Genoud, 2016). The time for imaging (1 mm) 3 could conceivably drop to less than one year using multi-beam scanning electron microscopy (Eberle & Zeidler, 2018), and recently a highly automated pipeline has been used to image 1 mm 3 in less than six months using six transmission electron microscopes (Yin et al, 2020). However, serial sectioning is still accompanied by inherently anisotropic resolution (Kreshuk et al, 2011;Kornfeld & Denk, 2018) and unavoidable knife-cutting artifacts (Khalilian-Gourtani et al, 2019), which can complicate faithful 3D characterization of the connectome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%