2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12541-016-0021-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A percussion performance analysis for rock-drill drifter through simulation modeling and experimental validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yang et al (2017) experimentally analy zed the dynamic characteristics of impact systems to obtain the stress wave curves of a jack rod at different impact velocit ies. Th rough the comparison between the analysis and experimental results, Seo et al (2016) validated the reliability of the analytical model is verified, and the effect of the main factors on the impact frequency and impact energy is understood by using the verificat ion results. Their analytical results indicated that the work area of the piston chamber is the main factor that affects impact energy and frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Yang et al (2017) experimentally analy zed the dynamic characteristics of impact systems to obtain the stress wave curves of a jack rod at different impact velocit ies. Th rough the comparison between the analysis and experimental results, Seo et al (2016) validated the reliability of the analytical model is verified, and the effect of the main factors on the impact frequency and impact energy is understood by using the verificat ion results. Their analytical results indicated that the work area of the piston chamber is the main factor that affects impact energy and frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The striking point can be judged through the feature of rear-chamber's pressure spike because of impact piston's rebound. Then, the velocity curve of impact piston can be obtained by feeding pressure data of front-chamber and rearchamber into equations (11), (12), and (27), which is shown in Figure 8. After that, the impact velocity can be obtained and so are the impact energy, impact frequency, and impact power Table 2 contains relative deviations between experimental and simulation results.…”
Section: Simulation Model Validation Using Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 However, the structure of percussion system is complicated, and its working process obeys the hydraulic-mechanical-pneumatic coupling laws, 10 which introduces great difficulty in researching on the percussion characteristic of hydraulic rock drill. J Seo and colleagues [11][12][13] developed an analysis model for rock drill using SimulationX software, which was validated by the static calibration and measurement tests of impact frequency and impact energy under three different supply pressure conditions. Based on a simulation model for rock drill built by AMESim, JY Oh et al 14 studied the dynamic performance of percussion system and effects of rock hardness on it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through an analysis of a rock drill impact module, Oh developed the impact performance analysis tool and analyzed the variation law of energy utilization rate for hydraulic impactor relative to rock stiffness [3]. Taking into considering the leakage and friction of impact piston pair, Seo analyzed the performance of the hydraulic impactor through simulation, then put forward the design method of structural parameters of the impact piston and determined the range of piston parameters [4]. Flegner tested the friction and wear of piston during the drilling process of hydraulic impactor under different drilling pressures and rotational speeds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%