2002
DOI: 10.1002/sim.1152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Pearson‐type goodness‐of‐fit test for stationary and time‐continuous Markov regression models

Abstract: Markov regression models describe the way in which a categorical response variable changes over time for subjects with different explanatory variables. Frequently it is difficult to measure the response variable on equally spaced discrete time intervals. Here we propose a Pearson-type goodness-of-fit test for stationary Markov regression models fitted to panel data. A parametric bootstrap algorithm is used to study the distribution of the test statistic. The proposed technique is applied to examine the fit of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aguirre-Hernández and Farewell [6] presented what was essentially an extension of Kalbfleish and Lawless's Pearson chi-square method, to cope with the common situation of irregular observation times and continuous covariates. Simulations suggest that the null distribution of this statistic is reasonably well approximated by the analogous χ 2 d−p distribution when there are no continuous covariates and has a slightly inflated mean when continuous covariates are present.…”
Section: Contingency Table Based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aguirre-Hernández and Farewell [6] presented what was essentially an extension of Kalbfleish and Lawless's Pearson chi-square method, to cope with the common situation of irregular observation times and continuous covariates. Simulations suggest that the null distribution of this statistic is reasonably well approximated by the analogous χ 2 d−p distribution when there are no continuous covariates and has a slightly inflated mean when continuous covariates are present.…”
Section: Contingency Table Based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remainder of the chapter considers in more detail some of the existing informal diagnostics for model fit, applying them to the CAV and BOS datasets. Chapter 3 develops existing work by Aguirre-Hernández and Farewell [6] on a general Pearson-type goodness-of-fit test for Markov models. The test is extended to allow application on misclassification hidden Markov models.…”
Section: Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A formal goodness-of-fit test for the hypothesis that panel data were generated by a fitted Markov model was developed by Aguirre-Hernandez and Farewell (2002). This test was extended by Titman and Sharples (2008) The null distribution of the statistic is not exactly χ 2 , with a complex form for general panel data (Titman 2009).…”
Section: Formal Goodness-of-fit Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test was extended by Titman and Sharples (2008) The null distribution of the statistic is not exactly χ 2 , with a complex form for general panel data (Titman 2009). For simpler models without covariates, Aguirre-Hernandez and Farewell (2002) showed by simulation that the χ 2 approximation was adequate. The pearson.msm function provides theoretical upper and (unless there are exact death times) lower bounds for the test p value.…”
Section: Formal Goodness-of-fit Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aguirre-Hernandez and Farewell (2002) and Titman and Sharples (2010) provide tests for a set of multi-state models, but this set does not include our model. However, Titman and Sharples also review less formal ways of model validation, and we use their basic ideas in the following validation of Model A.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%