2018 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/apec.2018.8341229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A partially rated DC-DC converter for power flow control in meshed LVDC distribution grids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, due to its simple topology and control, galvanic isolation, bidirectional power flow, wide input and output voltage adaptive range, high power density, and efficiency, is very promising in applications like Solid State Transformers (SST) [2][3][4], electric vehicle chargers with V2G concept [5] [6], power flow control in DC grids [7][8][9], etc.…”
Section: Introduction He Dab Convertermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, due to its simple topology and control, galvanic isolation, bidirectional power flow, wide input and output voltage adaptive range, high power density, and efficiency, is very promising in applications like Solid State Transformers (SST) [2][3][4], electric vehicle chargers with V2G concept [5] [6], power flow control in DC grids [7][8][9], etc.…”
Section: Introduction He Dab Convertermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, due to the fact that the required percentage of voltage regulation is not usually higher than ±20% of the nominal voltage, the proposed approach only uses the 20% of the original converter ratings. According to [30], one of the main drawbacks of using converters rated for the full power rating of the grid is their high losses for switching and conduction as well as their high maintenance costs. Although losses and costs analysis are out of the scope of this paper, it is expected that since it handles only the 20% of the total power, the losses and the costs of the proposed approach would be reduced with respect to the ones associated with the use of full rated converters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the advances in the power electronics the cost and losses remain a bottleneck. Similar solutions using partially rated power flow control converters (PFCC) were independently proposed for high voltage dc and lvdc [25], [30], [31], [32]. The PFCC reduces losses from the system perspective with processing only a fraction of the power that it is controlling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%